I saw mention of the new team name in another thread, but not a lot of discussion. While driving around yesterday it was the main topic of conversation on Sirius/XM FC 94, so I thought I would check to see what everyone around here thinks.
Personally I think they took the easy way out and were lazy. Does the name attempt to associate the club with larger and more tradition laden teams in Europe by using United? Yes. However, they are missing the mark as teams with United typically are due to multiple clubs combining at some point in history, which Atlanta is not doing.
I do like the fact they used FC since they used United are are naming the team in a similar fashion to a European club. If they decided to go the American route and be something like the Atlanta Eagles or something like that, then I would agree with SC for soccer club.
Anyone else have any views on this, or even care?
Personally I think they took the easy way out and were lazy. Does the name attempt to associate the club with larger and more tradition laden teams in Europe by using United? Yes. However, they are missing the mark as teams with United typically are due to multiple clubs combining at some point in history, which Atlanta is not doing.
I do like the fact they used FC since they used United are are naming the team in a similar fashion to a European club. If they decided to go the American route and be something like the Atlanta Eagles or something like that, then I would agree with SC for soccer club.
Anyone else have any views on this, or even care?