Read a thread about this on here a couple of days ago and in usual TC fashion, no stereotype was missing. Here's a few of my observations.
Soccer players are great athletes. They are not bigger, stronger, faster (although some are very fast) and can't throw further than most American athletes, but that doesn't mean they aren't great athletes. Perhaps Americans just tend to judge athletes in a different way.
Americans who do not like soccer are not ignorant. Fact is, soccer was around in America before any of the other major sports. We just found other sports that we like better. It is true that most Americans don't completely understand it and think it's boring because they don't completely understand it, but the same can be said for those who don't like baseball. Fact is, some people just don't want to understand it completely because they would prefer to watch other sports.
American's don't need to "catch on" to what the French like any more than the French need to "catch on" to American football. To each his own and no, they aren't a bit smarter because they like soccer better than football. That singular attitude sums up the stereotypical "soccer guy" best.
The idea that people don't like soccer as much in the South because they are backwoods and ignorant bothered me more than anything else I saw in that thread. I'm in Chicago working right now with 33 millwrights. Not a one of them have said a word about the World Cup, America scoring in the first half minute, or the Russian goalkeeper blowing an easy save. They talk a little about the Bears and the Cubs, and how the Blackhawks should have won the Stanley Cup.
BTW, only 26% of students that graduate from Chicago public high schools are college ready according to the SAT's. One in four Chicago High School students do not graduate high school and 91% of those who do have to take remedial courses in college before beginning college classwork. So how about let's get off Alabama just a little bit shall we?
Soccer players are great athletes. They are not bigger, stronger, faster (although some are very fast) and can't throw further than most American athletes, but that doesn't mean they aren't great athletes. Perhaps Americans just tend to judge athletes in a different way.
Americans who do not like soccer are not ignorant. Fact is, soccer was around in America before any of the other major sports. We just found other sports that we like better. It is true that most Americans don't completely understand it and think it's boring because they don't completely understand it, but the same can be said for those who don't like baseball. Fact is, some people just don't want to understand it completely because they would prefer to watch other sports.
American's don't need to "catch on" to what the French like any more than the French need to "catch on" to American football. To each his own and no, they aren't a bit smarter because they like soccer better than football. That singular attitude sums up the stereotypical "soccer guy" best.
The idea that people don't like soccer as much in the South because they are backwoods and ignorant bothered me more than anything else I saw in that thread. I'm in Chicago working right now with 33 millwrights. Not a one of them have said a word about the World Cup, America scoring in the first half minute, or the Russian goalkeeper blowing an easy save. They talk a little about the Bears and the Cubs, and how the Blackhawks should have won the Stanley Cup.
BTW, only 26% of students that graduate from Chicago public high schools are college ready according to the SAT's. One in four Chicago High School students do not graduate high school and 91% of those who do have to take remedial courses in college before beginning college classwork. So how about let's get off Alabama just a little bit shall we?