Why is it so difficult for the ACC membership to vote to adopt an unequal revenue sharing model based on some predetermined criteria that gives every member the opportunity and incentive to prioritize football performance and invest in facilities. Surely the lower-performing teams in football like Duke, Syracuse and Ga Tech know that the health of the league is in their best long-term financial interest too. Think of closing the revenue by redistributing a percentage of revenue from the low to the high performing teams by say $10-20 million. I’m not saying it’s popular; I’m just saying we need to think outside the box to survive now until something major changes in CFB that closes the gap long term.
Unequal revenue sharing question?
- Thread starter Frosty Frog
- Start date
Similar threads
Football Recruiting Weekend Roundup-Rivals Camp Miami
