If a poll had been conducted during last week's ACC spring meetings, there likely would have been unanimous agreement among coaches and administrators on the following four statements:
A -- College athletes getting compensated for Name, Image and Likeness is a very positive development and not going away.
B -- Many schools and boosters are using NIL as a disguise for "pay for play" in recruiting and retention of players.
C -- Schools and boosters also are using NIL as a tool for tampering with players on other schools' rosters.
D -- Stopping B and C from happening is going to be just about impossible.
Full story: While tampering and 'pay for play' are under fire, NIL is here to stay
A -- College athletes getting compensated for Name, Image and Likeness is a very positive development and not going away.
B -- Many schools and boosters are using NIL as a disguise for "pay for play" in recruiting and retention of players.
C -- Schools and boosters also are using NIL as a tool for tampering with players on other schools' rosters.
D -- Stopping B and C from happening is going to be just about impossible.
Full story: While tampering and 'pay for play' are under fire, NIL is here to stay
