Completely senseless incident. Will be interesting to watch the media coverage on this. I suspect it will be different than the coverage we see when a cop shoots a citizen.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Originally posted by Johnni...esNole:
Completely senseless incident. Will be interesting to watch the media coverage on this. I suspect it will be different than the coverage we see when a cop shoots a citizen.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Are you arguing it will get as much coverage as Michael Brown?Originally posted by tommynole3476:
Yeah, it's never a big deal when a cop is shot/murdered in America.
This place sometimes... it's just... never change, actually, change, please, for the better...
Of course it won't, and the reasons why should be obvious and understandable, why don't you try making a guess...Originally posted by nynole1:
Are you arguing it will get as much coverage as Michael Brown?Originally posted by tommynole3476:
Yeah, it's never a big deal when a cop is shot/murdered in America.
This place sometimes... it's just... never change, actually, change, please, for the better...
Posted from Rivals Mobile
You have issues and you need to speak to a professional to address them.Originally posted by GwinnettNole:
Originally posted by Johnni...esNole:
Completely senseless incident. Will be interesting to watch the media coverage on this. I suspect it will be different than the coverage we see when a cop shoots a citizen.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Yep--- probably less coverage than some drunk dumbass college kids singing a racist song on a bus too. PC media....
Posted from Rivals Mobile
This post was edited on 3/12 8:12 AM by GwinnettNole
"No, man, I was trying to murder another dude. I missed, and hit the cops by accident."Originally posted by tommynole3476:
Surprised no one updated the thread that the shooter wasn't part of the protest at all and was actually shooting at the protesters, not the cops... like, completely shocked...
Good grief, do you really not understand why people are upset about police shootings?Originally posted by JohnnieHolmesNole:
"No, man, I was trying to murder another dude. I missed, and hit the cops by accident."Originally posted by tommynole3476:
Surprised no one updated the thread that the shooter wasn't part of the protest at all and was actually shooting at the protesters, not the cops... like, completely shocked...
Total BS, of course, but reflective of a more flawed value system. Like shooting anyone is OK.
All of this is getting secondary coverage, at best. Imagine the outrage if this somehow happened the other way around (i.e., cop shoots two hoodlums, and then claims "accident" or "mistake").
Tommy, I think you missed the point. Yes, the hoodlum will be charged with a crime, as he should be. But the whole episode has been relegated to secondary news coverage. My point was that if a cop shot some hoodlums, that would be front page/24 hour coverage, and the usual pot-stirrers would be coordinating vigils, protests, etc., etc.Originally posted by tommynole3476:
Good grief, do you really not understand why people are upset about police shootings?Originally posted by JohnnieHolmesNole:
"No, man, I was trying to murder another dude. I missed, and hit the cops by accident."Originally posted by tommynole3476:
Surprised no one updated the thread that the shooter wasn't part of the protest at all and was actually shooting at the protesters, not the cops... like, completely shocked...
Total BS, of course, but reflective of a more flawed value system. Like shooting anyone is OK.
All of this is getting secondary coverage, at best. Imagine the outrage if this somehow happened the other way around (i.e., cop shoots two hoodlums, and then claims "accident" or "mistake").
Do you think the shooter is somehow not going to be charged with a crime now?
Originally posted by JohnnieHolmesNole:
Tommy, I think you missed the point. Yes, the hoodlum will be charged with a crime, as he should be. But the whole episode has been relegated to secondary news coverage. My point was that if a cop shot some hoodlums, that would be front page/24 hour coverage, and the usual pot-stirrers would be coordinating vigils, protests, etc., etc.Originally posted by tommynole3476:
Good grief, do you really not understand why people are upset about police shootings?Originally posted by JohnnieHolmesNole:
"No, man, I was trying to murder another dude. I missed, and hit the cops by accident."Originally posted by tommynole3476:
Surprised no one updated the thread that the shooter wasn't part of the protest at all and was actually shooting at the protesters, not the cops... like, completely shocked...
Total BS, of course, but reflective of a more flawed value system. Like shooting anyone is OK.
All of this is getting secondary coverage, at best. Imagine the outrage if this somehow happened the other way around (i.e., cop shoots two hoodlums, and then claims "accident" or "mistake").
Do you think the shooter is somehow not going to be charged with a crime now?
Nope, pretty sure you're the one missing the point, try again, you're almost (not even close to being) there.
Wait, so you think that a prosecutor and law enforcement are covering for a guy that shot two cops?Originally posted by goldmom:
I'm not buying it either. So shooting a some random guys who allegedly robbed him but wow missed and hit two cops.
Got it.....
From what I understand, this is what he said to the police. They are not buying what the guy is selling.Originally posted by OneNeverNoles:
Wait, so you think that a prosecutor and law enforcement are covering for a guy that shot two cops?Originally posted by goldmom:
I'm not buying it either. So shooting a some random guys who allegedly robbed him but wow missed and hit two cops.
Got it.....
I love you guys, man
I see ONN hasn't changed.Originally posted by runkpanole:
From what I understand, this is what he said to the police. They are not buying what the guy is selling.Originally posted by OneNeverNoles:
Wait, so you think that a prosecutor and law enforcement are covering for a guy that shot two cops?Originally posted by goldmom:
I'm not buying it either. So shooting a some random guys who allegedly robbed him but wow missed and hit two cops.
Got it.....
I love you guys, man
That's not true at all. The police and prosecutor both stated that his story may check out. The assault charge backs that up. Again, you believe that a prosecutor in the United States would not charge for attempted murder on two cops if they had anything that could support that?Originally posted by runkpanole:
From what I understand, this is what he said to the police. They are not buying what the guy is selling.Originally posted by OneNeverNoles:
Wait, so you think that a prosecutor and law enforcement are covering for a guy that shot two cops?Originally posted by goldmom:
I'm not buying it either. So shooting a some random guys who allegedly robbed him but wow missed and hit two cops.
Got it.....
I love you guys, man
Since you used the term 'not buying' I assume this might be the quote you're referring to, and to me, I'm not really sure whether they are 'not buying' his motive, that he was part of the protest earlier, or alone in the car; if pressed, it kind of seems like they're 'not buying' he was alone. Another story on it reads like they're not buying his motive for who he shot at, but not necessarily that he wasn't trying to shoot the cops. But it's a poorly worded/contextualized quote, IMO.Originally posted by runkpanole:
From what I understand, this is what he said to the police. They are not buying what the guy is selling.Originally posted by OneNeverNoles:
Wait, so you think that a prosecutor and law enforcement are covering for a guy that shot two cops?Originally posted by goldmom:
I'm not buying it either. So shooting a some random guys who allegedly robbed him but wow missed and hit two cops.
Got it.....
I love you guys, man