If you remember, I posted a fact pattern involving a mismarked gas line and the City hitting it while using a backhoe. Good discussion here. Anyway, my trial got pushed because of Harvey. So we decided to mock try the case. The case was pretty simple, so we were able to do it in a day. There was no voir dire, so our jury included some people that I probably would have struck. However, interesting enough when the jury started deliberating...they found both parties negligent and the apportionment discussion started at a 50/50 split and ended up at 70-30. 70% on the city.
It appeared that the themes that the city were the last ones to make sure the job was safe and testimony that the city employees were aware that the utility lines were constantly mismarked carried a lot of weight. The mock jury also bought in on the narrative that, had they hand dug around the mark - they would have realized that the line was mismarked when they didn't find the gas line and called the gas company.
It appeared that the themes that the city were the last ones to make sure the job was safe and testimony that the city employees were aware that the utility lines were constantly mismarked carried a lot of weight. The mock jury also bought in on the narrative that, had they hand dug around the mark - they would have realized that the line was mismarked when they didn't find the gas line and called the gas company.