I'm not sure what to even think about this one.
http://www.kcci.com/news/man-killed-in-officerinvolved-shooting/33497168
http://www.kcci.com/news/man-killed-in-officerinvolved-shooting/33497168
You made it sound like he was power walking and got shot. The reports are that he was being chased by a male officer, both he and the office in high speed chase. Apparently the female office boxed him in, so he got out of his car and ran at her while she was sitting in her car. When he got close she opened fire.I'm not sure what to even think about this one.
http://www.kcci.com/news/man-killed-in-officerinvolved-shooting/33497168
Hmmm. Of all the most recently publicized incidents, this is the first I am hearing of women officers being trigger happy. I would be interested in whether you have something to back up your claim that women officers resort to use the of force more so then men?Female cops -- usually lacking the physical ability to defuse situations -- are generally quick to reach for their guns or tasers.
I actually remember hearing something about a study or research done that female officers are much more likely to diffuse a situation verbally than their male counterparts. I'll try to find it, but the reasoning seems understandable and sound. This was posed as a way to reduce police use of violence, to have more female police officers.Hmmm. Of all the most recently publicized incidents, this is the first I am hearing of women officers being trigger happy. I would be interested in whether you have something to back up your claim that women officers resort to use the of force more so then men?
As for the OP, you read ESPN and the NYT a lot don't you?
I actually remember hearing something about a study or research done that female officers are much more likely to diffuse a situation verbally than their male counterparts. I'll try to find it, but the reasoning seems understandable and sound. This was posed as a way to reduce police use of violence, to have more female police officers.