Polar bears
- Thread starter Lemon Thrower
- Start date
Or...they could just swim across and avoid the tolls.
This post was edited on 2/25 1:01 PM by F4Gary
They'd have to hire Canadians....they are used to polar bears. "Dollar please, ay."Originally posted by Zeek99:
Who's going to make a polar bear pay the toll?
Why even post...........let them have their fun (if that's what they think it is)Originally posted by tolkien1:
Weather not climate. Science is your friend.Originally posted by MR . B:
Global warming.
This post was edited on 2/25 5:25 PM by fsu1jreed
True. They haven't used global warming since it stopped making sense. Climate is much more comprehensive and fluid.Originally posted by tolkien1:
Weather not climate. Science is your friend.Originally posted by MR . B:
Global warming.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
And yet the Climate Change proponents us it all the time to help their cause, and that brings dead silence from a ton of people like you.Originally posted by tolkien1:
Weather not climate. Science is your friend.Originally posted by MR . B:
Global warming.
However this is just basic chemistry..........Originally posted by nynole1:
True. They haven't used global warming since it stopped making sense. Climate is much more comprehensive and fluid.Originally posted by tolkien1:
Weather not climate. Science is your friend.Originally posted by MR . B:
Global warming.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
CO2 (aq) + H2O
i dont know what this means.Originally posted by Buckheadnole:
And yet the Climate Change proponents us it all the time to help their cause, and that brings dead silence from a ton of people like you.Originally posted by tolkien1:
Weather not climate. Science is your friend.Originally posted by MR . B:
Global warming.
Climate.gov: "Why did Earth's surface temperature stop rising in the past decade?" Right an article because the data doesn't support the narrative.Originally posted by fsu1jreed:
However this is just basic chemistry..........Originally posted by nynole1:
True. They haven't used global warming since it stopped making sense. Climate is much more comprehensive and fluid.Originally posted by tolkien1:
Weather not climate. Science is your friend.Originally posted by MR . B:
Global warming.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
CO2 (aq) + H2OCO32− + 2 H+
My post wasn't talking about climate, because that's not really the elephant in the room.............ocean acidification is and that is directly related to atmospheric CO2 concentrations (through that chemical formula), and it WILL have a negative affect on ocean biota. And I know most humans don't care about pushing species to extinction, but last I looked, humans get a large amount of food from the oceans so hopefully that MIGHT give us some pause to finally do something about our CO2 emmisions.....but I highly doubt it.Originally posted by nynole1:
Climate.gov: "Why did Earth's surface temperature stop rising in the past decade?" Right an article because the data doesn't support the narrative.Originally posted by fsu1jreed:
However this is just basic chemistry..........Originally posted by nynole1:
True. They haven't used global warming since it stopped making sense. Climate is much more comprehensive and fluid.Originally posted by tolkien1:
Weather not climate. Science is your friend.Originally posted by MR . B:
Global warming.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
CO2 (aq) + H2OCO32− + 2 H+
Like the great George Carlin said, the planet will be fine, its the people who will be f**ked!Originally posted by fsu1jreed:
My post wasn't talking about climate, because that's not really the elephant in the room.............ocean acidification is and that is directly related to atmospheric CO2 concentrations (through that chemical formula), and it WILL have a negative affect on ocean biota. And I know most humans don't care about pushing species to extinction, but last I looked, humans get a large amount of food from the oceans so hopefully that MIGHT give us some pause to finally do something about our CO2 emmisions.....but I highly doubt it.Originally posted by nynole1:
Climate.gov: "Why did Earth's surface temperature stop rising in the past decade?" Right an article because the data doesn't support the narrative.Originally posted by fsu1jreed:
However this is just basic chemistry..........Originally posted by nynole1:
True. They haven't used global warming since it stopped making sense. Climate is much more comprehensive and fluid.Originally posted by tolkien1:
Weather not climate. Science is your friend.Originally posted by MR . B:
Global warming.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
CO2 (aq) + H2OCO32− + 2 H+
I have no problem with that............but that doesn't give us the excuse to take other species with us.Originally posted by nynole1:
Like the great George Carlin said, the planet will be fine, its the people who will be f**ked!Originally posted by fsu1jreed:
My post wasn't talking about climate, because that's not really the elephant in the room.............ocean acidification is and that is directly related to atmospheric CO2 concentrations (through that chemical formula), and it WILL have a negative affect on ocean biota. And I know most humans don't care about pushing species to extinction, but last I looked, humans get a large amount of food from the oceans so hopefully that MIGHT give us some pause to finally do something about our CO2 emmisions.....but I highly doubt it.Originally posted by nynole1:
Climate.gov: "Why did Earth's surface temperature stop rising in the past decade?" Right an article because the data doesn't support the narrative.Originally posted by fsu1jreed:
However this is just basic chemistry..........Originally posted by nynole1:
True. They haven't used global warming since it stopped making sense. Climate is much more comprehensive and fluid.Originally posted by tolkien1:
Weather not climate. Science is your friend.Originally posted by MR . B:
Global warming.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
CO2 (aq) + H2OCO32− + 2 H+
Thread about furry white critters who have people on their food list has become political.
Such a shame. Thread must be locked?
Such a shame. Thread must be locked?
I feel like there is a lot more going on with that post.Originally posted by fsu1jreed:
I have no problem with that............but that doesn't give us the excuse to take other species with us.Originally posted by nynole1:
Like the great George Carlin said, the planet will be fine, its the people who will be f**ked!Originally posted by fsu1jreed:
My post wasn't talking about climate, because that's not really the elephant in the room.............ocean acidification is and that is directly related to atmospheric CO2 concentrations (through that chemical formula), and it WILL have a negative affect on ocean biota. And I know most humans don't care about pushing species to extinction, but last I looked, humans get a large amount of food from the oceans so hopefully that MIGHT give us some pause to finally do something about our CO2 emmisions.....but I highly doubt it.Originally posted by nynole1:
Climate.gov: "Why did Earth's surface temperature stop rising in the past decade?" Right an article because the data doesn't support the narrative.Originally posted by fsu1jreed:
However this is just basic chemistry..........Originally posted by nynole1:
True. They haven't used global warming since it stopped making sense. Climate is much more comprehensive and fluid.Originally posted by tolkien1:
Weather not climate. Science is your friend.Originally posted by MR . B:
Global warming.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
CO2 (aq) + H2OCO32− + 2 H+
Originally posted by goldmom:
Thread about furry white critters who have people on their food list has become political.
Such a shame. Thread must be locked?[/QUOTE]ocean acidification hasn't been politicized yet, and I hope to God azzhats (eg Gore) keep their damn mouth shut about it
Thread about furry white critters who have people on their food list has become political.
Such a shame. Thread must be locked?[/QUOTE]ocean acidification hasn't been politicized yet, and I hope to God azzhats (eg Gore) keep their damn mouth shut about it
??????
In short, humans are the cause for many species' demise. It's really a shame. We learn more about the magnificence of many of these animals - their emotions, intelligence, abilities - and we're killing them. Some on purpose for jewelry or hides, some accidentally based on our selfishness.
I contribute to it all so I'm not here to judge. But a little difference from myself and from others could make a huge difference.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
I contribute to it all so I'm not here to judge. But a little difference from myself and from others could make a huge difference.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
there has been a constant drum beat of details of falsified data. the link above has the latest. fwis, the Telegraph is like a cross between the WSJ and NYTimes - very respected, establishment newspapers.
two decades ago you had the fake hockey stick-we're all going to drown - extrapolation graphs.
i think climate change is the only science that relied on full page ads in the usatoday and "consensus-building." i don't remember when they added those to the scientific method.
More fake data
I almost said that..........but if he thinks any of the modern media outlets are "respectable" then there's nothing I can really sayOriginally posted by EconSean:
NYT respected? That seems counter to the general consensus in the LR.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
I know what cognitive dissonance is.............and you are being a perfect example of it in this thread, because I gave you new information that conflicts with existing beliefs, ideas, or values (ie that humans can't possibly impact the Earth).
This post was edited on 2/27 12:07 PM by fsu1jreed
no, you changed the subject from "scientists" faking data regarding global warming to the acidity of the oceans. I never commented about the acidity of the oceans.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Football Five for 2025: Thoughts on FSU as calendar flips to a new year- Latest: Bob Ferrante
-
