Good book...Originally posted by seminoleed:
Duma Key, on the other hand, was a very pleasant surprise.
Posted from Rivals MobileOriginally posted by speechteach:
Since everyone recommended The Stand, and one person recommended Hearts in Atlantis, I will second that one. I actually want to read it again. There is something about the most significant moments in life, and mixing those with horror, that King did so very well.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Originally posted by BelemNole:
I just re-read Eyes of the Dragon. It's really a young adult fiction that he wrote for his kids that sort of the same setting as the dark tower. My son is 11 and reads voraciously so I got him that and Cycle of the Werewolf. They were the first SK books I read 30 odd years ago. Still hold up.
Hearts in Atlantis is my wife's favorite. Might be her favorite book overall. The movie was so bad she left the theater in tears.
Duma Key is a solid choice.
Talisman is fantastic, but it's coauthored with Peter Straub, so maybe not the best first choice.
The Stand might be his best work, but it's a biiig novel. Start smaller.
Posted from Rivals MobileOriginally posted by speechteach:
Since everyone recommended The Stand, and one person recommended Hearts in Atlantis, I will second that one. I actually want to read it again. There is something about the most significant moments in life, and mixing those with horror, that King did so very well.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Yes, indeed. And "Rage", the first of them, foreshadows Columbine in a very eerie way...like King knew what was coming 40 years later. Also liked "The Long Walk", a novel idea for a story.Originally posted by nygaflmd-nole:
The Bachman Books. 4 short stories including the inspiration for "The Running Man" (this version would be way better than the Arnold version as a movie.)
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Worst comparison ever. The variety in King's work is so vast I don't how he can be accused of being "formulaic". Now, in certain genres-- mainly the horror/sci-fi -- he has repeated a theme. But he has an incredible gift of story-telling and character development.Originally posted by poewilly:
people that think stephen king is a good writer think dane cook is hilarious...
its just formulaic crap....
The research for Joyland had to be immense. The language of the Carnie was well done.Originally posted by MIKE_G:
Worst comparison ever. The variety in King's work is so vast I don't how he can be accused of being "formulaic". Now, in certain genres-- mainly the horror/sci-fi -- he has repeated a theme. But he has an incredible gift of story-telling and character development.Originally posted by poewilly:
people that think stephen king is a good writer think dane cook is hilarious...
its just formulaic crap....
Same thing with 11/22/63, copious amounts of research, interviews, site visits and walk throughs were done to make it as tonally accurate as possible.Originally posted by Phinhead:
The research for Joyland had to be immense. The language of the Carnie was well done.Originally posted by MIKE_G:
Worst comparison ever. The variety in King's work is so vast I don't how he can be accused of being "formulaic". Now, in certain genres-- mainly the horror/sci-fi -- he has repeated a theme. But he has an incredible gift of story-telling and character development.Originally posted by poewilly:
people that think stephen king is a good writer think dane cook is hilarious...
its just formulaic crap....