Matter of time. Kansas City Chiefs have already banned warpaint, feathers and Indian attire. The next vestige under review is the “chop”. Anyone wearing Indian attire, etc., will be asked to remove it prior to being able to enter the stadium.
Matter of time. Kansas City Chiefs have already banned warpaint, feathers and Indian attire. The next vestige under review is the “chop”. Anyone wearing Indian attire, etc., will be asked to remove it prior to being able to enter the stadium.
Matter of time. Kansas City Chiefs have already banned warpaint, feathers and Indian attire. The next vestige under review is the “chop”. Anyone wearing Indian attire, etc., will be asked to remove it prior to being able to enter the stadium.
Doubtful. Considering the Seminole Tribe makes all of Osceola’s ceremonial dress. We also don’t exploit Native American’s and their history. We embrace it it and celebrate it, with the blessing of the tribe as previously mentioned. 10,000 woked protesters can’t change that.Well, I guess we should get ready for a Naked Chief Osceola riding Renegade.
If the Chiefs had an ownership structure like the Packers then they might, but the Chiefs are a private business. They can set their rules and people can reject them by not attending.How do you enforce such a ban? Seems like they might have some issues with this kind of thing being Constitutional.
again I think this comes down to what the tribe wants? i wouldn't be opposed to the question being asked.The scalping reference in the Fight Song is horrible and needs to go