ADVERTISEMENT

The Patriots and Tom Brady just declared war on ESPN

Fsubk82

All-ACC
Feb 21, 2003
675
701
653
Saw this article and wanted to share. Nice to see another team tired of ESPNs WWE storyline crap.

As one chapter of Deflategate comes to a close and another chapter opens thanks to a bombshell ESPN report, Tom Brady and the New England Patriots seem to be making a concerted effort to blame one organization for all of the troubles: ESPN itself.

The Patriots responded to the ESPN report that alleged that Bill Belichick was a masterful serial cheater (or at least loophole finder) and the seemingly oversized response from the NFL in Deflategate originated with Spygate, with a statement calling into question the report itself and ESPN’s credibility on the issue.

In the statement, the Patriots called the report unsubstantiated and mourned the alleged damage to the team’s reputation that the reporting on Spygate had done over the years. “As recently as last month, over seven years after the reaction and apology was issued, ESPN issued the following apology to the Patriots for continuing to perpetuate the myth: ‘On two occasions in recent weeks SportsCenterincorrectly cited a 2002 report regarding the New England Patriots and Super Bowl XXXVI,” the Patriots’ statement read. “The story was found to be false, and should not have been part of our reporting.'”

ESPN is an easy target for the Patriots and Brady to blame as the rubble that the Deflategate scandal created continues to smolder. It’s better for the league, and by de facto its team owner and star player, for there to be a public truce between them. After all, they mutually profit off of each other’s success and can more easily be rallied to move onto football. ESPN — and the media — on the other hand, in this case, are easily moved to be the villain that wants to talk about distractions and not the beautiful game.

So at the end of a scandal when everyone lost but no one really was punished, it’s easiest to levy consequences on the people who reported on it in the first place.

Meanwhile, Brady, who somehow seemed to have come out of cheating allegations surrounding his team’s playoff run to a Super Bowl unscathed, emerged for a victorious media lap on Tuesday morning. One stop: Boston radio station WEEI, where he said among other important tidbits about his marriage and love for European soccer, that he will cut back on interview availability to ESPN (among other outlets) — a media network built in the Patriots’ backyard that is generally credited with playing a large role in at least the public part of the spectacle of Deflategate.

But what promising to cut back on interviews for ESPN and other media outlets or calling their stories unfounded tries to make fans ignore is why a federal judge overturned Brady’s suspension. It wasn’t because he found that he did or did not cheat. What he found was that the disciplinary system in the NFL made no sense — something we’ve all known for a long time. As for the latest bombshell, it’s easier to shout that ESPN is dredging up old stories that aren’t true than it is to read through the entire thing and accept that it is.



When asked about what seemed like a coordinated campaign against them coming out of New England, ESPN spokesman Josh Krulewitz said that ESPN serves “fans by covering all on-the-field and off-the-field aspects of the league aggressively on a daily basis. The league and its teams recognize we are a news organization and expect fair coverage.”
 
"When asked about what seemed like a coordinated campaign against them coming out of New England, ESPN spokesman Josh Krulewitz said that ESPN serves “fans by covering all on-the-field and off-the-field aspects of the league aggressively on a daily basis. The league and its teams recognize we are a news organization and expect fair coverage.

418c7371c3ea42c89d786eec04d34ebc.gif
 
So are they saying ESPN is a bunch of liars or the Pats are cheaters? Or both?
 
Sorry but the patriots organization and ESPN are no better than each other ....both of them(organizations) could no longer exist and I wouldn't lose any sleep
 
Sorry but the patriots organization and ESPN are no better than each other ....both of them(organizations) could no longer exist and I wouldn't lose any sleep

I am sure ESPN has made a bunch of viewers feel the same about FSU as you do the Patriots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: booker20
FSU should ally with the Patriots in declaring war. Then they agree to only draft FSU prospects.
 
I watch the NFL Network, NBA Network, MLB Network and Fox Sports as much as possible. I don't watch Sports Center anymore, and will only watch ESPN if there is a college game that I really, really want to watch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nolezfan81
Sucks the ACC is aligned with the train wreck that is ESPN.

It has turned into TMZ.......

It jumped the shark with Paul F. and has doubled down with pushing gambling.
 
I'll preface this by stating the obvious: ESPN suckssssssssss.

That said, I'm pretty sure the NFL has policies regarding answering questions and conversing with members of the media. If Tom Brady and the Pats think they can just shun ESPN (one of the NFL's biggest partners), I would have to imagine Goodell and the NFL will have the last laugh in the form of cash money. They don't play around: ask Marshawn Lynch.

For the record I hate the Pats just as much as ESPN and hope they both drown in the vast sea that is their own hubris.
 
I'll preface this by stating the obvious: ESPN suckssssssssss.

That said, I'm pretty sure the NFL has policies regarding answering questions and conversing with members of the media. If Tom Brady and the Pats think they can just shun ESPN (one of the NFL's biggest partners), I would have to imagine Goodell and the NFL will have the last laugh in the form of cash money. They don't play around: ask Marshawn Lynch.

For the record I hate the Pats just as much as ESPN and hope they both drown in the vast sea that is their own hubris.

There's a difference in fulfilling obligations and going above and beyond. Players can stand up, give vanilla player speak just enough to fulfill its obligations to espn. Then turn around and hook up there competitors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fsubk82
I just wonder how many bridges being burned it will take until teams in all leagues start realizing it isn't beneficial to speak with ESPN anymore due to their emphasis on entertainment over sports reporting now.

I understand the conundrum of college football coaches needing ESPN due to recruiting but the pros could in theory just fulfill their obligations and not go above and beyond.
 
  • Like
Reactions: booker20
I am so tired of sports "journalists" whining and moaning about being called out when they have their agendas exposed and their incompetent work criticized. This whole "don't blame us, we just report it." BS is effing ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CJRN
Being a fan of both the Noles and Pats has been interesting the last couple years. It has really opened my eyes to the hypocritical angle the media plays to generate revenue through clicks and ratings. It's easy to hate a winner and when possible fan the flames right? You'd think that FSU is the only program with off the field issues and NE is the only organization that tries to get a leg up by pushing the limit. ESPN is awful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: booker20 and jray07
True. I can definitely see that being the case. I could see it flying early on for a while, but unfortunately I think eventually even Tom and his cronies would have to tow the line.
 
I just wonder how many bridges being burned it will take until teams in all leagues start realizing it isn't beneficial to speak with ESPN anymore due to their emphasis on entertainment over sports reporting now.

I understand the conundrum of college football coaches needing ESPN due to recruiting but the pros could in theory just fulfill their obligations and not go above and beyond.

ESPN pays more for rights to broadcast NFL games than any other network, so yeah, the NFL has something to lose if ESPN doesn't feel they are getting their money's worth. Secondly, you guys are completely irrational when it comes to ESPN. The Patriots have been busted for cheating, that is a fact. We are just coming off of courts being involved with recent alleged cheating, that's a fact. Teams and players around the league have long been suspicious of the Patriots cheating (just see Tomlin's post game press conference last night). How you guys don't think this should be covered, is beyond me. I realize Tom might not want to talk about it, which is fine, but that doesn't mean others won't talk about. I'm sure Barry Bonds didn't want to talk about steroids either that doesn't mean it wasn't a huge story. Anytime one of the all time greats is accused of cheating (and there is evidence to back up said accusations), it is going to be a major story, the Patriots are no different.
 
ESPN pays more for rights to broadcast NFL games than any other network, so yeah, the NFL has something to lose if ESPN doesn't feel they are getting their money's worth. Secondly, you guys are completely irrational when it comes to ESPN. The Patriots have been busted for cheating, that is a fact. We are just coming off of courts being involved with recent alleged cheating, that's a fact. Teams and players around the league have long been suspicious of the Patriots cheating (just see Tomlin's post game press conference last night). How you guys don't think this should be covered, is beyond me. I realize Tom might not want to talk about it, which is fine, but that doesn't mean others won't talk about. I'm sure Barry Bonds didn't want to talk about steroids either that doesn't mean it wasn't a huge story. Anytime one of the all time greats is accused of cheating (and there is evidence to back up said accusations), it is going to be a major story, the Patriots are no different.

I hate the Pats but deflated footballs was stupid for it to be such a big deal. Of course, Tom could have easily made it a non issue by saying he told the guys he likes the balls at the lower end but never instructed them to break the rules or heck even said I didn't know the exact pressure at the low end and he apologizes for not being clear to the ball boys that they should not go below the lowest level of air pressure.

Now the spygate things was terrible and they should have been hammered much harder. IMO, it was worse than bountygate and should have received stiffer punishment than the saints got.
 
I hate the Pats but deflated footballs was stupid for it to be such a big deal. Of course, Tom could have easily made it a non issue by saying he told the guys he likes the balls at the lower end but never instructed them to break the rules or heck even said I didn't know the exact pressure at the low end and he apologizes for not being clear to the ball boys that they should not go below the lowest level of air pressure.

Now the spygate things was terrible and they should have been hammered much harder. IMO, it was worse than bountygate and should have received stiffer punishment than the saints got.

But it isn't ESPN's fault is my point. It is a story. You cannot expect ESPN to not report on a story regarding the SB champions, a HOF QB, etc, that ends up involving courts and and judges and everything else. Even if you don't think deflated footballs should have led to all of that, no one can possibly blame ESPN for covering it. That is my point.
 
Last edited:
But it isn't ESPN's fault is my point. It is a story. You cannot expect ESPN to not report on a story regarding the SB champions, a HOF QB, etc, that ends up involving courts and and judges and everything else. Even if you don't think deflated footballs should have led to all of that, no one can possibly blame ESPN for covering it. That is my point.
how about espn (Chris Mortenson) tweeting false reports...11 of 12 balls greatly underinflated...and not correcting it? The judge saying their was no proof that Brady had anything to do with underinflated footballs?
 
how about espn (Chris Mortenson) tweeting false reports...11 of 12 balls greatly underinflated...and not correcting it? The judge saying their was no proof that Brady had anything to do with underinflated footballs?

That isn't what the judge said. The judge said the infraction was not punishable by a suspension under the CBA, he did not declare Brady innocent, big distinction. But what does the judge have to do with Brady being mad at ESPN? Nobody involved in the court case works for ESPN. And Mort was going off sources, and missed with some facts. Supposedly he did retract it, he just forgot to retract it on twitter. He jumped the gun. It's not good, but it happens. IN saying that, he missed on the PSI levels, he didn't miss on the story as a whole. His points were still correct, his #s were just off.
 
Last edited:
That isn't what the judge said. The judge said the infraction was not punishable by a suspension under the CBA, he did not declare Brady innocent, big distinction.

Wildcat is kind of correct, the judge did not say that there was no direct evidence, however, Judge Berman did ask the NFL if there was any direct evidence linking Brady to the deflated balls, in effect, calling out the NFL for their lack of evidence linking Brady to any ball deflation. http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/deflate-gate-tom-brady-roger-goodell-face-off/story?id=33035520

Cubs is correct, Berman did not find Brady innocent, and he stayed away from that part of the appeal so that he would not be overturned on appeal. He ruled against the NFL in terms of they screwed up the process pretty bad and that they NFL abused their power. Berman purposely stayed away from the guily/innocent part of the appeal.

As far as Mortenson, he was feed some pretty bad info by someone from the NFL and he never retracted his Tweet, nor did he correct the erroneous info. I guess he was correct, but was as wrong as one could be while being correct.
 
Wildcat is kind of correct, the judge did not say that there was no direct evidence, however, Judge Berman did ask the NFL if there was any direct evidence linking Brady to the deflated balls, in effect, calling out the NFL for their lack of evidence linking Brady to any ball deflation. http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/deflate-gate-tom-brady-roger-goodell-face-off/story?id=33035520

Cubs is correct, Berman did not find Brady innocent, and he stayed away from that part of the appeal so that he would not be overturned on appeal. He ruled against the NFL in terms of they screwed up the process pretty bad and that they NFL abused their power. Berman purposely stayed away from the guily/innocent part of the appeal.

As far as Mortenson, he was feed some pretty bad info by someone from the NFL and he never retracted his Tweet, nor did he correct the erroneous info. I guess he was correct, but was as wrong as one could be while being correct.

Mortenson's fault was saying that 11 of 12 balls were 2 lbs underweight. If he had just stuck to 11 of 12 balls were underinflated , he would have been fine, since that appears to be true. The 2 lbs is what made him wrong. And while he certainly should have verified that # before tweeting it, it doesn't get the Patriots off the hook.
 
[QUOTE="Cubs79, post: 718455, member: 23474"it doesn't get the Patriots off the hook.[/QUOTE]

I never implied that it got the Patriots off the hook.
 
[QUOTE="Cubs79, post: 718455, member: 23474"it doesn't get the Patriots off the hook.

I never implied that it got the Patriots off the hook.[/QUOTE]

I know you didn't. But the tone of the thread in general seems to imply that, so I wanted to throw that out their.
 
Covering an issue is far different than making it a nearly 24-hour-a-day saga. There are too many good stories in sports for this crap to be the only options for programming.

That goes for any scandal du jour, including ones people believe are made up. I don't see ESPN being any better or worse than CNN or the others. ESPN's only saving grace is they actually show live sports.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT