I'm honestly not trying to cause an argument, but I don't understand why our government goes to such great lengths to accommodate him and kiss his papal rear to the extent that they do.
Apparently 22% of the country is Catholic, which means that 78% of the country is not Catholic. Yet, the Pope is here and we're shutting down most of DC so that he can have a parade, meet with the President, speak to Congress, etc, etc, etc.
Why does he meet with Congress? What business could he possibly have with them? He's not (supposed to be) a politician. He's not the head of any country (not really counting Vatican City).
And if there's supposed to be some sort of separation between church and state (which, practically, there isn't), then why would the government expend this much effort on someone whose influence is limited to moral issues and a chance at the afterlife?
Not only that, but we're also paying for some of the costs associated with the visit - especially the related security costs. If he wants to visit the US and go around talking to different Catholic/religious groups, then more power to him, but why is it a national/federal event to have the Pope visit? Why do we need to shut down most of the streets in DC and have tens of thousands of people work from home to avoid coming into the District, so that he can come and be paraded around for a couple of days?
I'm certainly not questioning what anyone believes in, or who they hold to be important. My question is more about visiting government official, versus some other important person or celebrity that's visiting. To some extent, my questions are the same about when the Dalai Lama visits, although he's not treated quite this extravagantly when he visits.
Apparently 22% of the country is Catholic, which means that 78% of the country is not Catholic. Yet, the Pope is here and we're shutting down most of DC so that he can have a parade, meet with the President, speak to Congress, etc, etc, etc.
Why does he meet with Congress? What business could he possibly have with them? He's not (supposed to be) a politician. He's not the head of any country (not really counting Vatican City).
And if there's supposed to be some sort of separation between church and state (which, practically, there isn't), then why would the government expend this much effort on someone whose influence is limited to moral issues and a chance at the afterlife?
Not only that, but we're also paying for some of the costs associated with the visit - especially the related security costs. If he wants to visit the US and go around talking to different Catholic/religious groups, then more power to him, but why is it a national/federal event to have the Pope visit? Why do we need to shut down most of the streets in DC and have tens of thousands of people work from home to avoid coming into the District, so that he can come and be paraded around for a couple of days?
I'm certainly not questioning what anyone believes in, or who they hold to be important. My question is more about visiting government official, versus some other important person or celebrity that's visiting. To some extent, my questions are the same about when the Dalai Lama visits, although he's not treated quite this extravagantly when he visits.