Like Chuck Norris, or Steven Segal....Originally posted by tommynole3476:
That's not even the most effed up thing about that... well, ok, shooting him with an actual gun instead of a tazer is pretty effed up.... but....
HE'S NOT EVEN A "REAL" COP!!!!
Basically, he's a wealthy retired dude who donates a lot of money and equipment to the force, and has been deputized because of it. So he basically bought the right to be a cop! And he even has the right to use deadly force under certain circumstances (it remains to be seen whether this was one of those instances, but probably not).
a rich ZimmermanOriginally posted by tommynole3476:
That's not even the most effed up thing about that... well, ok, shooting him with an actual gun instead of a tazer is pretty effed up.... but....
HE'S NOT EVEN A "REAL" COP!!!!
Basically, he's a wealthy retired dude who donates a lot of money and equipment to the force, and has been deputized because of it. So he basically bought the right to be a cop! And he even has the right to use deadly force under certain circumstances (it remains to be seen whether this was one of those instances, but probably not).
Doesn't Shaq have this deal in some places? Arizona maybe?Originally posted by BelemNole:
Like Chuck Norris, or Steven Segal....Originally posted by tommynole3476:
That's not even the most effed up thing about that... well, ok, shooting him with an actual gun instead of a tazer is pretty effed up.... but....
HE'S NOT EVEN A "REAL" COP!!!!
Basically, he's a wealthy retired dude who donates a lot of money and equipment to the force, and has been deputized because of it. So he basically bought the right to be a cop! And he even has the right to use deadly force under certain circumstances (it remains to be seen whether this was one of those instances, but probably not).
They charged the man with Manslaughter....damn, they aren't playing. This should be interesting.Originally posted by BelemNole:
Like Chuck Norris, or Steven Segal....Originally posted by tommynole3476:
That's not even the most effed up thing about that... well, ok, shooting him with an actual gun instead of a tazer is pretty effed up.... but....
HE'S NOT EVEN A "REAL" COP!!!!
Basically, he's a wealthy retired dude who donates a lot of money and equipment to the force, and has been deputized because of it. So he basically bought the right to be a cop! And he even has the right to use deadly force under certain circumstances (it remains to be seen whether this was one of those instances, but probably not).
Can't come soon enough.Originally posted by BelemNole:
It's about time. You want to play with big-boy toys you have to suffer big-boy consequences when you eff up.
Got to get his money's worth! Fire the old taser into him!Originally posted by West Duval Nole:
From the video it looked and sounded like he had the suspect under control. It didn't seem like a taser was even necessary. And I suppose Al and Jesse will be in Oklahoma protesting soon, as I am sure their take will be this would not have happened to a non black suspect.
C'mon!!! While they shouldn't run, that is hardly justification for using deadly force. Not all incidents are the same. The Michael Brown incident is completely different from this one. This should not have happened whether this guy ran or not! Tazing him in this situation did not even seem to be needed and seems would have been done just so he could taze someone.Originally posted by Vizike Is Back!:
Why are so many guys resisting arrest these days? No one seems to care about the why these cops are put into these situations to begin with.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
The next time a bunch of kids scatter and run from a house party where their underage drinking, I hope every single one of them gets gunned down.Originally posted by jamnolfin:
I'm not going to run from the cops or resist in any way because I could get shot, of course I'm not going to do anything that I feel like I need to run from. I would just assume somebody that is running has done something bad. Not condoning what the police did but who cares whose fault it is when you are dead, don't get yourself in that position.
Originally posted by Rhino_nole:
The next time a bunch of kids scatter and run from a house party where their underage drinking, I hope every single one of them gets gunned down.Originally posted by jamnolfin:
I'm not going to run from the cops or resist in any way because I could get shot, of course I'm not going to do anything that I feel like I need to run from. I would just assume somebody that is running has done something bad. Not condoning what the police did but who cares whose fault it is when you are dead, don't get yourself in that position.
I think this is true of wanna-be cops. Most cops I know don't enjoy shooting their guns. Most only shoot them at the firing range the required minimum to stay certified. I know a large number of cops, by far the majority of them have never had to fire their weapon while on duty, more than 50% of them have never even taken it from their holster.Originally posted by JohnnieHolmesNole:
Cops, and especially wanna-be cops, enjoy shooting their guns. Never give these folks any reason to carry out their inner passions.
This should yield a spectacular lawsuit against a myriad of defendants.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
I have a pretty unique perspective on LEO. I'm a son of a retired state trooper, nothing more gut wrenching than your father not coming home when his midnight or 1 AM shift was over and there was no phone call for hours. A lot of our family friends were LEOs and I've been working w/ LEO for 15 years. I've heard a lot of stories in the confidence of the "blue wall of silence" of some great cops and a lot about some sh!tty awful LEOs and people. From racism, sexism, homophobia, to bullying inside and outside the agency to aggressive and borderline psychotic behavior. Police officer are a microcosm of society except their a group of "highly trained" individuals that are supposed to determine and assert the level of force needed in any given situation. It's a damn difficult job and I do not begrudge a police officer who just wants to come home and hug and kiss his family when his shift is over.Originally posted by seminole97:
The next time a bunch of kids scatter and run from a
house party where their underage drinking, I hope every single one of
them gets gunned down.
Why not just the ones fleeing arrest warrants?
"Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen. The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning. Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom." - Ludwig von Mises
Make a law that a man has to pay for his progeny and I think the rest is in some sense almost inevitable. There will be someone, somewhere who is so unwilling to come to grips with the responsibilty society and his actions have created that he will resist, and that resistance will be met with force. Someone will push the confration up the police's 'force contiuum and find his butt shot.
If you can't manage to avoid having a warrant for your arrest issued I would suggest complying with police orders when encountering them to provide yourself the best chance of escaping the scene with your life.
I think the officer was not justified in this instance, but I think if you create combustible situations frequently enough you'll get explosions some of the time.
Huh?Originally posted by seminole97:
There's an inherit distrust of law enforcement officers
in specific areas around the country and that needs to be explored.
National Geographic explores the drug war all the time on their channel.
If I was slinging weed from my front stoop I would 'distrust' cops more than I already do... jus' sayin'
There's a growing contingent that is getting vocal against the militarization and gross over-use of power by our LEO, and it's coming out of the Libertarian Party. Those are not people "slinging weed from their front stoop".Originally posted by Rhino_nole:
Huh?Originally posted by seminole97:
There's an inherit distrust of law enforcement officers
in specific areas around the country and that needs to be explored.
National Geographic explores the drug war all the time on their channel.
If I was slinging weed from my front stoop I would 'distrust' cops more than I already do... jus' sayin'
This is why legit discussions can't be had. You honestly think I was discussing the criminal element that distrust law enforcement officers?
Ironically, same people that would be in favor of legalizing "slinging weed from their front stoop."Originally posted by dmm5157:
There's a growing contingent that is getting vocal against the militarization and gross over-use of power by our LEO, and it's coming out of the Libertarian Party. Those are not people "slinging weed from their front stoop".Originally posted by Rhino_nole:
Huh?Originally posted by seminole97:
There's an inherit distrust of law enforcement officers
in specific areas around the country and that needs to be explored.
National Geographic explores the drug war all the time on their channel.
If I was slinging weed from my front stoop I would 'distrust' cops more than I already do... jus' sayin'
This is why legit discussions can't be had. You honestly think I was discussing the criminal element that distrust law enforcement officers?
TrueOriginally posted by kc78:
The tazer and the gun feel very similar when pulling it from your holster. I could see an undertrained person grabbing the wrong item with adrenaline running and shooting before he realized it was incorrect.
That doesn't negate the fact that this situation didn't necessitate a taze, much less a gun shot. So there was no reason for either weapon to be fired. I could see having it pulled just in case he gained the upper hand in the tussle, but at that time there were several officers on the man getting him cuffed.
Secondy, its just generally a bad idea to let a 73 year old untrained man carry a weapon and make those kinds of decisions. At best you need to treat him as Barney Fife. Give him one bullet that he keeps in his pocket. If he truly needs it, he can take the time to load before firing.
It's different for a bunch of kids at a party to haul butt than it is for a adult pulled over in a car and taking off when the cop has their identity, it makes you wonder what they have done so bad. Cops do live in fear and I wouldn't want to risk what might be going through their heads when I take off. My son in law is a cop and i worry about him all the time, thank goodness he just got promoted to investigator. I just don't want to put myself in even the remotest of situations to die, if I say yes sir no sir and don't resist he probably won't shoot me. When you are dead who cares whose fault it is?Originally posted by Rhino_nole:
The next time a bunch of kids scatter and run from a house party where their underage drinking, I hope every single one of them gets gunned down.Originally posted by jamnolfin:
I'm not going to run from the cops or resist in any way because I could get shot, of course I'm not going to do anything that I feel like I need to run from. I would just assume somebody that is running has done something bad. Not condoning what the police did but who cares whose fault it is when you are dead, don't get yourself in that position.
Originally posted by goldmom:
Why a 73 year old is allowed to be on any sort of active duty is beyond me. Why he was on duty as an armed officer is just mind numbing.
And why the heck are folks running to begin with? Why give these people the excuse or opportunity to even pull their weapon? It doesn't excuse the shootings in any way, but dang, figure it out. Do NOT run. Some of these cops are crazy, or incompetent, or just dumb. You want to give them an "excuse"?
The audio tape of the cops surrounding that cop in North Charleston and the conversation right after the murder of that man was chilling. The triggerman is not the only one who should face charges.