When you hear Jimbo give his "coaches speeches" (which is fine), we hear much of things or plays that "could have been" had something not happened, or if this player did this, ect....
I've often thought that our philosophies rely on complete perfection on both sides of the ball in order for success to occur. I know we push execution to ensure players do not miss anything and get everything right, but in the end, if perfection for each player, on each play, are the only keys to success, it seems like our schemes are based on unrealistic expectations?
Am I way off here??
I've often thought that our philosophies rely on complete perfection on both sides of the ball in order for success to occur. I know we push execution to ensure players do not miss anything and get everything right, but in the end, if perfection for each player, on each play, are the only keys to success, it seems like our schemes are based on unrealistic expectations?
Am I way off here??
