and I auto drafted him....yay for me!
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-s...ady-suspension-in-deflate-gate-221425352.html
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-s...ady-suspension-in-deflate-gate-221425352.html
Apparently neutral parties don't like the idea of a single man being judge, jury and executioner. Goodell exercises his power like Kim Jong-un.Has the NFL won a single appeal in recent memory?
Apparently neutral parties don't like the idea of a single man being judge, jury and executioner. Goodell exercises his power like Kim Jong-un.
So what. If a player doesn't want to be subject to discipline, he doesn't have to play in the NFL. He can go to the CFL, or he can go get a job in the regular working world.
Apparently neutral parties don't like the idea of a single man being judge, jury and executioner. Goodell exercises his power like Kim Jong-un.
Don't get me wrong, not a Goodell fan. But, wasn't that the main crux of the most recent Collective Bargaining? The teams gave up more $ to the players, and the NFLPA gave the authority to Goodell. They signed up for that, right?
So, in essence, the judge didn't rule on the specific punishment as much as he ruled on the agreement that governs the process? I can buy that.I just skimmed the judge's decision but it appears the league ran roughshod over the entire process. Same as a company completely disregarding a collective bargaining process they agreed to.
Especially in cases where all they have are suspicions and not proof.White people always get off....
Yup, this was more an opinion on the agreement / the NFLs adherence to it.So, in essence, the judge didn't rule on the specific punishment as much as he ruled on the agreement that governs the process? I can buy that.
So, in essence, the judge didn't rule on the specific punishment as much as he ruled on the agreement that governs the process? I can buy that.
That's not the issue here. The judge ruled on the agreement in place between the NFL and the Players Association, which apparently Goodell ran roughshod over.Brady is a cheating dirtbag.
I understand the decision....which does not change the fact that Brady is a cheating dirtbag....but I would NOT kick his wife out of bed for eating crackers.That's not the issue here. The judge ruled on the agreement in place between the NFL and the Players Association, which apparently Goodell ran roughshod over.
The NFL screwed themselves, despite the fact that Brady is a cheating dirtbag.
White people always get off....
I'm a Pats fan and I'm not certain how I feel about the "cheating" component of this
If I had to bet, yea he probably did (most QBs prob do but that doesn't make it okay).
However, there wasn't enough evidence for the NFL to ding him for it and even if he did 'cheat', 4 games is a disproportionate punishment for the 'crime'.
But my real thought is... what a monumental waste of friggin time. Two d'bags, Goodell and Brady, bickering over ego in a federal court. Wish these a-holes would stop wasting the court's time for their idiotic d9ck measuring contest. SMDH.
The idea that Goodell says "Brady just say you did it and I'll reduce it to 1-2 games" is ridic -- if he admits it, keep the goddamn 4 games. I applaud Brady for not bowing at Goodells feet and wish Adrian Peterson had fought his NFL suspension last year just as vigorously.
Goodell is drunk on power and money.
While I believe Pete Rose should be in the Hall, those are two completely different issues for a multitude of reasons.treatment of Brady seems inconsistent with Pete Rose.
While I believe Pete Rose should be in the Hall, those are two completely different issues for a multitude of reasons.
You do realize New England won 45-7 right?I agree. Brady's actions might have affected the result of the game; Rose's did not.