I don't know who this guy is but he's full of manure. There are too many case studies that prove otherwise. This is like one guy out of thousands saying that global warming isn't an issue. I can find thousands of these..
I am not surprised that you do not know who AJ Rothschild is, as you are clearly completely unfamiliar with the research on this topic. I am, however, surprised that you did not recognize his name and that you think that he is full of manure, because he and his work are cited in the paper you linked.
Regardless, Dr. Rothschild is the chair of the department of psychiatry at the UMASS medical school. He is also the director of the Center for Psychopharmacologic Research & Treatment, and he literally wrote the Clinical Manual for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Psychotic Depression and The Evidence-Based Guide to Antidepressant Medication. He has published over 120 peer-reviewed studies of the effects of psychiatric medications and has been awarded essentially every award in the field of psychiatry.
Do you know who TJ Dodds, the author of the study you linked, is? I don't, and nobody I know in the mental health field knows who he is either. He apparently has no institutional affiliation, and this article is literally the only one that he has published on the topic. Your analogy is correct, if you swap the authors in question: you have found the Andy Wakefield of benzodiazepines, except with fewer credentials and less experience. His article that you posted would not be considered passable work in any undergraduate research methods class. He apparently does not even grasp the high school level distinction between correlation and causation.
I would think that you were trolling by posting the article you chose, if I did not have a more probable explanation: you did not even take a cursory glance at the Rothschild article. If you had, then you would have seen that it is a direct and comprehensive refutation of precisely the article you posted. As you apparently can not be bothered to do even the most basic due diligence, I will excerpt another relevant passage:
"In his review, Dr Dodds failed to include or cite several important published literature reviews
8,
9 that do not substantiate the argument that benzodiazepines are associated with rage attacks, physical assault, self-destructive behavior, or depression.
Studies such as ours
2 and others,
10 which allowed for the assessment of behavioral disturbances in a high-risk population under 24-hour observation, found no increased risk of suicide or suicide attempts in patients taking benzodiazepines. A third study
11 done in 47 psychiatric hospitals in Germany, which Dr Dodds mistakenly used to support his opinion that benzodiazepines are associated with an increased risk of suicide or suicide attempts, also did not conclude that there was an increased risk of suicide or suicide attempts in patients taking benzodiazepines.
The invocation by Dr Dodds of the Bradford-Hill criteria for causation
12 is inappropriate because no statistically significant association of benzodiazepines with an increased risk of suicide or suicide attempts was reported by Dr Dodds. No meta-analysis was done. If no statistically significant positive association is found, it cannot be said that exposure to the drug is associated in any way with the outcome, much less that cause and effect has been established. The analysis of potential causality would be over; there is no causality.
13"
It is not a coincidence that you happened to post exactly the article that was being directly and completely rebutted in the article that I posted. You found literally the one study in the entire research literature on the topic that supports your superstition, and that one study has been wholly discredited. You are the one in the company of climate change deniers and anti-vaxxers.
You will notice that Dr. Rothschild did not say that the "majority" or the "preponderance" of the scientific evidence does not support the conclusion that benzodiazepines increase the risk of suicide. He said the "totality" of the scientific evidence does not support the conclusion that benzodiazepines are even associated with an increased risk of suicide. That means literally "all" of the scientific evidence is counter to your superstition.