Does anybody know how that works? I would think it is some sort of average between HS recruiting class and portal class. . .but it just seems waaaaaay off.
For example UF has the #9 recruiting class, but the #89 portal class. . .their comprehensive ranking is #12.
FSU has the #20 ranked recruiting class and the #12 portal class. . .for a comprehensive ranking of #17.
Miami. . .#13 recruiting, #34 portal. . .comprehensive ranking: #11
I guess the more I look at it, it's just a total points system, based on their rankings given to each kid, I'm not sure how else they could do it. I mean, for the immediate future I'd much rather have a senior left tackle with tons of SEC experience than a four star tackle who won't see the field for two years. I get how getting the HS talent is important for long term success, but proven experience has value, too. I guess I just feel that our big time gets out of the portal would carry a bit more weight in the comprehensive rankings that what we are seeing.
I know rankings don't mean much, but when you look at needs, would you trade our current comprehensive class for either UM or UF's. With this haul of immediate plug in OL, DL, and LB I know I wouldn't.
For example UF has the #9 recruiting class, but the #89 portal class. . .their comprehensive ranking is #12.
FSU has the #20 ranked recruiting class and the #12 portal class. . .for a comprehensive ranking of #17.
Miami. . .#13 recruiting, #34 portal. . .comprehensive ranking: #11
I guess the more I look at it, it's just a total points system, based on their rankings given to each kid, I'm not sure how else they could do it. I mean, for the immediate future I'd much rather have a senior left tackle with tons of SEC experience than a four star tackle who won't see the field for two years. I get how getting the HS talent is important for long term success, but proven experience has value, too. I guess I just feel that our big time gets out of the portal would carry a bit more weight in the comprehensive rankings that what we are seeing.
I know rankings don't mean much, but when you look at needs, would you trade our current comprehensive class for either UM or UF's. With this haul of immediate plug in OL, DL, and LB I know I wouldn't.
