The ticket would have still been available on the original sales portal if the scalper hadn't purchased.
So you think that the face value on tickets for that game was in fact above the market clearing price and they would still be available to me today? Personally, I'm dubious of that assumption.
The scalper is taking the risk (and recouping the reward) that you are incorrect in that initial assessment.
The scalpers participation is why tickets remain available even for highly demanded shows up to the last minute.
Again, I prefer the opportunity to buy something at a higher price versus seeing an empty shelf with a lower price tag.
The "added value" of "I can get it from the scalper" is a myth. The only value the scalper adds to the process is being an additional middle man inflating prices.
He's getting the ticket into the hands of whomever wants it the most.
Is that bad?
What if you had a ticket, but saw they were selling for $1k on Stubhub. Are you a bad person for selling me that ticket at that price so you can spend $1k on some other activity with your family and I can take dad to his last game. Who is the loser in that situation? Who should be upset, and why?
It is akin to you having access to only 1 grocery store. Someone goes in and buys all the product that you cannot produce on your own, say aluminum foil. Then they try to sell it to you right outside the grocery store for an inflated price. By purchasing all the available tickets, they have moved the product from a free market into a limited and controlled market.
If there is only one place for me to get the foil I'm already in a monopoly situation. Why in that scenario am I paying less than the market clearing price anyway? I'm having trouble getting this comparison off the ground as the situation (single seller) hasn't changed.
The important thing to remember is that seller can only get up to the price you're willing to pay. He can never get more.
The angst seems to stem from the notion of paying closer to what you think the ticket (or foil, etc) is actually worth?
This is why there are laws against scalping.
There are laws against all kinds of things people don't like, but that in and of itself doesn't justify those laws.
I read BJs are outlawed in FL. Does that change your opinion of the activity?
This is why the artists are slowly banding together to not use venues that allow scalping and ensuring the price they set isn't modified.
Bands (and really any producer) can underprice their product to ensure sell outs if it suits them, but what is the justification for not seeing those tickets go to whomever wants them the most?