ADVERTISEMENT

Southwest Airlines doesn't let passenger fly with pet fish

Hey now, 35 years ago SeaPA used to sit on a Greyhound bus to Tally to escape the boredom of a small town in southern Georgia. I didn't talk to any fish, but I did get very excited when the stop in the next town south was at a liquor store. When I got back on the bus with a handful of cans of Club Cocktails, the driver told me "you know you can't drink those on the bus, right?"
When I responded, "I wouldn't think of doing that" he laughed & said, "go to the back of the bus, son."
I've been on the back of the bus too. I'm not a member of the mile high club, but I am of the 55mph club......(I see what he did there.....). Things are different on the bus.
 
Here's the Southwest Airlines policy, from their website -

General Information
Southwest Airlines allows small vaccinated domestic cats and dogs to travel with you in-cabin under the seat in front of you. All pets must be carried in an appropriate carrier, as indicated below.

Pet Reservation & Payment Information



    • Pets traveling are subject to a $95 Pet Fare each way per pet carrier.

      Pet Fares are nonrefundable and may not be applied toward future-date travel if unused. Please note, the Pet Fare is subject to change at any time.
    • U.S. Domestic Flights: Reservations must be made in advance by calling 1-800-I-FLY-SWA (1-800-435-9792). On the day of travel, Customers must bring the pet to the airport in an approved pet carrier. Proceed to the airport ticket counter to check the pet in and pay the Pet Fare before going to the departure gate.

No way in hell am I ever bringing my cat on the plane. If I did, I'm sure it would be just like at home; she'd sprawl across the middle of the seat, and I'd end up sitting on the damn floor.
 
No way in hell am I ever bringing my cat on the plane. If I did, I'm sure it would be just like at home; she'd sprawl across the middle of the seat, and I'd end up sitting on the damn floor.

Right up until the evil flight attendant told you to put it in the carrier, and then under the seat in front of you. At the end of your flight you'd have the cat from Pet Sematary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Random_John
Times change.

soooooooooooooo
source.gif
 
So, I don’t think jumping to pathologizing people is helpful.

I promise I'm not being antagonistic when I ask this question as this your realm and not mine.

If cause and effect is not helpful then what is helpful?
 
Granted and the world was different in the1800 's vs 25 years ago. But between the 1800's and pre-internet how often did people beg to take their service (insert creature here) anywhere? People were lucky to not be dying of cholera. Now, people need fish on a plane
If you can't fly without your pet, you can't fly. The exception would be Veterans.

A service pet. He loves Walmart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Random_John
You all are heartless bastards. She could have put the fish in a ziplock and no one would have known except her. That's what I've done with mine. 2.5 fl oz and TSA is fine. SWA never even knows. One more reason to wear cargo shorts.
 
I promise I'm not being antagonistic when I ask this question as this your realm and not mine.

If cause and effect is not helpful then what is helpful?
I am not interpreting your posts as antagonistic, though I do worry that they are somewhat stigmatizing. I absolutely believe that examining the causes of these situations is valuable and helpful. I do not believe that assuming the cause to be a pathology residing within the individual is helpful.
 
My brother in law bought a "service animal" jacket for his Golden Retriever just to bring him into restaurants, public places etc. I'm not sure if he ever tried to bring him on plane.
 
Bottom line is people are cuckoo for coco puffs and it's gotten worse over the years for whatever reason.
 
My brother in law bought a "service animal" jacket for his Golden Retriever just to bring him into restaurants, public places etc. I'm not sure if he ever tried to bring him on plane.
The de facto response from most mental health professionals these days to requests for ESA certification letters has become "check out google."

One nuance that we have not discussed in this thread is the distinction among service animals, therapy animals, and support animals. All are different and are subject to different laws and regulations.
 
This seems more like an assertion of a top line, not a bottom line.


Would you agree that, as a whole, the population has more mental health issues than before? If so, Why?

If not, what makes you say no?
 
Would you agree that, as a whole, the population has more mental health issues than before? If so, Why?

If not, what makes you say no?
My armchair get-off-my-lawn theories:

1) Millenials interpersonal relationships are more superficial than prior generations, so their normal bond with their pets seems more important to them.

2) Today, work/school/social life have crept into every minute of the day. Millennials can't even conceive of a time when you could forget about work the moment you walked out of the office at 5pm. They live in a world where they have to be ready to be 'on' at any moment; whereas in the olden days people could take an extended mental break every day.

3) A lot of the people with emotional support animals are really just using it as an excuse to bring their pets on planes, etc.

4) People have always had mental problems, but the fact that animals can help is a fairly new concept.
 
I was traveling this week and couldn’t believe how many dogs I saw in the airport. A couple cats too.

Are people just too cheap to board their pets for a few days?
 
Would you agree that, as a whole, the population has more mental health issues than before? If so, Why?

If not, what makes you say no?

As a whole, the topic isn't stigmatized as much anymore so people are willing to seek treatment. This is a good thing.
 
As a whole, the topic isn't stigmatized as much anymore so people are willing to seek treatment. This is a good thing.

It's also ridiculously overplayed because at some point in life development, we're having a greater and greater amount of human beings that lack any ability (nor developed that ability) at all to face adversity, and/or to problem solve to relatively "good" solutions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KitingHigh
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT