ADVERTISEMENT

Bud Light VP Takes “”Leave of Absence”

Status
Not open for further replies.
Glad you’re so familiar with OnlyFans accounts that you can share that info with us 😂😂😂😂
I'm not stupid enough to pay for stuff I could easily see for free. I have no sympathy for the gullible simps who spend their money on that garbage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole777
Yeah you're right...my reference toward women exploiting their physical appearances for personal profit exists purely in my imagination. You got me. 🙄
So if MEN didn’t keep making it profitable would they still keep putting up photos of themselves?
What a dumb business model...oh well, women just don’t understand bidness. 🙄
 
Yeah you're right...my reference toward women exploiting their physical appearances for personal profit exists purely in my imagination. You got me. 🙄
And I’m sure many of those are the exact same ones protesting beer ad sexism. I just saw some random claim that on a message board, so it’s gotta be legit.
 
So if MEN didn’t keep making it profitable would they still keep putting up photos of themselves?
What a dumb business model...oh well, women just don’t understand bidness. 🙄
Then why the complaining about "sexist beer ads" if the women involved participated under their own free will?? Can't have it both ways...Male nature is male nature. None of us would be here posting without it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seminoleed
Then why the complaining about "sexist beer ads" if the women involved participated under their own free will?? Can't have it both ways...Male nature is male nature. None of us would be here posting without it.
I’m pretty sure the references to sexist beer ads flew right over your head as you were too busy liking the super-convincing notion that the Dylan pushback is because it’s insulting to women.
Carry on.
 
I’m pretty sure the references to sexist beer ads flew right over your head as you were too busy liking the super-convincing notion that the Dylan pushback is because it’s insulting to women.
Carry on.
The women in my life... including my wife...feel insulted by these cheap knockoffs. Perhaps they're anomalies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole777
Then why the complaining about "sexist beer ads" if the women involved participated under their own free will?? Can't have it both ways...Male nature is male nature. None of us would be here posting without it.
You’re right.
But the little secret women know if their IQ is at least room temp is that men don’t think with their brain...that’s how they’re made.
To ensure the survival of the human species, of course. It’s been a spectacular success. 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsufool
You should read up on Catherine the Great.
Fortunately I attended Kate Sullivan Elementary in Tally, before teaching accurate history was banned, and we already learned that the urban legend about Catherine the Great’s death was and remains fabricated myth.
 
I’m pretty sure the references to sexist beer ads flew right over your head as you were too busy liking the super-convincing notion that the Dylan pushback is because it’s insulting to women.
Carry on.
It IS insulting to biological women.
The reason(s) are multiple and all are reasonably plausible.
 
Guess the men over the centuries who have used their big heads to build the society we all enjoy don't count. 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole777
There was a time when a lot of things were different. For better and for worse. We live in a much smaller world today where we are informed in real time what people and businesses are advocating for or against. I have zero issues with that. As a consumer I have yet to see anything in that arena that has swayed me one way or the other. Most likely because I pay very little attention to it.
WB, Fair enough. These things don't really influence me all that much either, but that's you and me as individuals... obviously, as seen by Bud light, it can have a huge impact on general public. The question that I posed on the thread is: "What purpose does a business pushing any social or political agenda serve?" The primary goal of any business is make profits, pushing a social or political agenda places that primary goal at risk, and that makes on economic sense at all.

The purpose of advertising a product is to generate more sales. In that measure, Anheuser failed in a colossal way. Truthfully, the advertisement doesn't make me want to boycott Anhueser, but it doesn't make we want to buy their beer either.

If the owner CEO of Chik-fil-a, who definitely has conservative views, started including pro-life messages in his adverstisments, he would be putting his profits at severe risk. IMO, the blowback would be huge. Again it would not make economic sense.

On a side note: not a craft beer guy, but I actually love an ice cold Budweiser (not Bud Light) , I also love an ice cold Coors Banquet... I could go either way, depends on my mood, but that advertisement doesn't influence me to buy Budweiser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noletaire
Fortunately I attended Kate Sullivan Elementary in Tally, before teaching accurate history was banned, and we already learned that the urban legend about Catherine the Great’s death was and remains fabricated myth.
I heard it was Queen Elizabeth 1.
Maybe it’s because I went to Catholic school and she was one of those mean Protestants.
 
Guess the men over the centuries who have used their big heads to build the society we all enjoy don't count. 😉
Hmmm we’ll never know because over the centuries women weren’t allowed to use THEIR big heads and in about half the world Neanderthal men still don’t allow them to.
 
Kate Sullivan was awesome! We also learned that later in life there might appear message boards where we’d encounter humans too clueless to decipher finely played humor.
 
Why do I get the impression that you sat by yourself in the cafeteria more than once...
Careful there Mom, aren’t you She Who Protests Against Personal Insults, whenever you’re not throwing out “bait”?
lol
 
Back when I used to work at Publix, Kate Sullivan's teachers would occasionally bring their classes in for tours. I always felt sorry for the kids for their poor field trip budget.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole777
Back when I used to work at Publix, Kate Sullivan's teachers would occasionally bring their classes in for tours. I always felt sorry for the kids for their poor field trip budget.
I feel gypped. We almost burned down the school when I was 8 and they wouldn’t take us to the first Publix Grand Opening at the Northwood Mall, but the kid who was supposed to bring the gas used it all in his newfangled power mower. Loser.
 
I feel gypped. We almost burned down the school when I was 8 and they wouldn’t take us to the first Publix Grand Opening at the Northwood Mall, but the kid who was supposed to bring the gas used it all in his newfangled power mower. Loser.
I remember that Publix. I was a junior at FSU and my boyfriend (future hubby) and I did a publicity photo shoot where we posed as a happy young couple shopping in Tallahassee’s newest grocery store.
The fake smiles were something else. I think we made $25 each 😬
 
I always felt sorry for the kids for their poor field trip budget.
But on the other hand, think of the great knowledge they obtained as 8 year olds, being reflective about their gender and realizing they can be male, female or a little bit of both. These are all questions that 6-8 year olds should ponder to help guide them to a bright future.

Then throw in history lessons about Catherine the Great's love life, they could debunk the great myths that Catherine did not practice beastiality, but could focus on her sexuality and numerous sexual partners.
These youngsters were truly empowered. Imagine what "show and tell" was like in that class. LMFAO! Finely played humor, indeed. Pure comedy
 
But on the other hand, think of the great knowledge they obtained as 8 year olds, being reflective about their gender and realizing they can be male, female or a little bit of both. Then throw in history lessons about Catherine the Great's love life, they could debunk the great myths that Catherine did not practice beastiality.
These youngsters were truly empowered. Imagine what "show and tell" was like in that class. LMFAO!
The teachers probably take them to Hustler Hollywood nowadays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noletaire
But on the other hand, think of the great knowledge they obtained as 8 year olds, being reflective about their gender and realizing they can be male, female or a little bit of both. These are all questions that 6-8 year olds should ponder to help guide them to a bright future.

Then throw in history lessons about Catherine the Great's love life, they could debunk the great myths that Catherine did not practice beastiality, but could focus on her sexuality and numerous sexual partners.
These youngsters were truly empowered. Imagine what "show and tell" was like in that class. LMFAO! Finely played humor, indeed. Pure comedy
Great indeed! Even before the debut of Red Dragon, our teachers warned us about the dangers of Hannibal Lecter loitering daily outside the fence at recess.
Prescient!
 
WB, Fair enough. These things don't really influence me all that much either, but that's you and me as individuals... obviously, as seen by Bud light, it can have a huge impact on general public. The question that I posed on the thread is: "What purpose does a business pushing any social or political agenda serve?" The primary goal of any business is make profits, pushing a social or political agenda places that primary goal at risk, and that makes on economic sense at all.

The purpose of advertising a product is to generate more sales. In that measure, Anheuser failed in a colossal way. Truthfully, the advertisement doesn't make me want to boycott Anhueser, but it doesn't make we want to buy their beer either.

If the owner CEO of Chik-fil-a, who definitely has conservative views, started including pro-life messages in his adverstisments, he would be putting his profits at severe risk. IMO, the blowback would be huge. Again it would not make economic sense.

On a side note: not a craft beer guy, but I actually love an ice cold Budweiser (not Bud Light) , I also love an ice cold Coors Banquet... I could go either way, depends on my mood, but that advertisement doesn't influence me to buy Budweiser.
There is no doubt the advertising strategy failed. Funny you mention chik fil a. I lived in Washington state and in the Seattle area there was one chik fil a store located in Bellevue. The line to get in the parking lot was always ridiculously long. I asked around why they hadn’t developed more stores and was told it was because of the company’s views on same sex marriage and the thought was that people out there wouldn’t support such an organization.
Move ahead 5-7 years and there are 10 current stores with another dozen in the planning stages. The moral of the story is that most consumers have a very short memory. Especially if they like your chicken and waffle fries.
 
We will see if his followers (most of whom are likely kids) make up for the zillions leaving. I’d say 75% of the guys I know won’t touch an InBev product of any kind.

And it’s very different from a rainbow can. Don’t care. None of my business. But a full grown man who pretends to be a pre teen girl should not be honored. The idea he was recognized by the damn VP for a full year of “girlness” is a bad thing for everyone. There’s a limit.

I had to go back and find the post, it is over a month old. In the month since my post, Bud Light sales have continued to fall so it appears that your question has already been answered. Additionally, the pushback from the LGBTQ community following BL's marketing "do over" seemingly indicates sales will not receive a bump from any new customers.

few questions for you based on your response:
1. Why do you feel the followers are primarily kids? I am not on TikTok or Instagram, so I have no reference point to base who follows whom on those platforms.
2. The campaign, similar to the rainbow cans, was done to "support" a segment of society. Why do you feel they are "very" different other than one was a group done in a national marketing campaign and the other was a singular person as part of an influencer post?
3. Of The 75% of your friends who refuse to purchase InBev products, was it the 2016 national ad when BL used a female to male transgender person or did they stop after they saw Dylan's Instagram post? Do they follow Dylan on social media or did they see the post somewhere else?
4. What is there a limit to? Influencers corporations should hire? Or the number of people we do not like?
 
You’ve got it backwards. When I say vast majority, I mean the vast majority don’t want social and political issues inserted into their sports or daily lives. There’s a reason why companies and entities who choose to push those issues into those segments of people’s live generally suffer financial consequences.
No, corporations make political statements all the time. Sometimes with the products they make, sometimes with what they sell or won't sell, sometimes with their political lobbying. Generally, corporations try to stay within bounds of what is generally accepted by the majority of their potential customers as legitimate even if some customers have alternative viewpoints. Of late, a few have tried to purposely push the boundries for various reasons. And they have had pushback for doing that.

Folks on here are trying to make this something it is not. First, these examples are very specific to trans and what has been going on with children. It has nothing to do in general with gay people. And whoever thought up and green lighted these two small marketing plays were idiots and are probably fired as a result of their stupidity. Its great fodder for ideologues, but in the long run will just go down as stupid marketing decisions.
 
Why a gay pride or straight pride month? How about just be proud 24/7/365 in your chosen sexuality. I believe the majority of people truly don’t care about what someone does or who they do it with in their lives. As long as it doesn’t interfere with how they choose to live their respective lives. Live and let live, however don’t push your agenda or policies on them.
Gays were kept in the closet for most of history. There were and still are laws on the books against them. If they/we want to celebrate their newly won freedoms with parades and marketing campaigns, that seems to be a positive movement to me. As an aside, the more gays are allowed to be a normal part of society (gay rights, gay marriage) the lower their mental illness and suicide rates go.
 
Great indeed! Even before the debut of Red Dragon, our teachers warned us about the dangers of Hannibal Lecter loitering daily outside the fence at recess.
Prescient!
More than a bit peculiar... you accuse me of stalking you, call me Hannibal, tell me to go away but then continually respond to my posts which are sent to other posters.... Its ok, I don't take offense because I know your commentary.
GO NOLES!!
Your old friend
Noletaire
not "Your old friend" in the slightest, just adds to your bizarre Hannibal vibe.

BTW, didn't the current management already warn you about stalking me from thread to thread in your super obsessive and persistently creepy manner? Maybe not, but feel free to ignore my posts rather than to continue with your irrefutably weird stalking thing.
And again, not "Your old friend" in the slightest, just adds to your bizarre Hannibal vibe.

you do indeed follow me around from thread to thread with your little laughy emojis and "Your old friend" ultraHannibalcreepiness.

Please just go away
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Wow
Reactions: NoleLizards
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT