Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SPOILER: JMO but I think the length really helped. Unless the director was completely biased, all the footage shows him in enough states of mood and circumstance to see what type of character/temper he really has. Peterson is either a tremendous liar, the director is tremendously one-sided, or he's innocent. Without enough time you wouldn't be able to get to that level of analysis.It was soooo long. I feel like they could have done it in half the time.
SPOILER: JMO but I think the length really helped. Unless the director was completely biased, all the footage shows him in enough states of mood and circumstance to see what type of character/temper he really has. Peterson is either a tremendous liar, the director is tremendously one-sided, or he's innocent. Without enough time you wouldn't be able to get to that level of analysis.
I teach and am around kids 9 hours a day, and many of you have met me. Neither you or the students know me.
Not gonna lie, this makes your avatar a lot creepier...
Interesting. I'd say the odds of that are higher than if he used a blowpoke to cause fatal wounds but not skull fractures or other obvious collateral damage.I think there is a small chance he did it. The body in Germany is insane and hard to ignore. If that wasn’t part of his past, I’d say innocent.
The owl theory that I read after the fact is the craiziest, but most plausible explanation, at least based on what I have read it’s the most plausible.
Long story short. Feathers from an owl were found in her hair, the hair that she had in her hand, that was ripped out of her head....I believe that is where it was found.
What are the odds of that??
Divide his air time /his life time and you are going to tell me it's a judge of his temperament ?
I teach and am around kids 9 hours a day, and many of you have met me. Neither you or the students know me.
Spoiler: The French documentary director actually dated Michael during the series filming!With keen insight you can tell most anything about someone from a few instances: how they handle authority/power, how they handle undue stress, and how they treat the vulnerable of this planet. We do this in weeding out our potential athletes/clients all the time.
Watch closely, it's all there. His voice inflection, hand gestures, the way he looks at his family, treats the prison guards, reacts to obviously unfair legal decisions, etc. So he is either A) legit, B) a schizo murderer, or C) the documentarians didn't show a whole bunch of other footage. I say if not C, then A. Nobody hides "B" 100% of the time.
Huge Stephen King fan and anxiously awaited the New It. It's my favorite book.My first thought too
I want to think he done it but there is just not a chance that I as a juror could have convicted him I don't think. I thought the defense did a brilliant job in creating reasonable doubt. From the first episode, I thought he was 100% guilty, by the time the court recessed and jury went into deliberation, I was about 20% certain.
Owl theory is the only plausible explanation to create those lacerations on her head without causing some sort of bruise, cracked skull, etc.
How do you not like David Rudolf? I thought he was phenomenal.
I’d argue he changed more over the course of the show than anyone. I too didn’t care much for him at first.I didn't like him at first, viewed him as typical say anything lawyer.
By the end, I was a fan. Really good lawyer, just like with his client he changed my mind.
I’d argue he changed more over the course of the show than anyone. I too didn’t care much for him at first.
Anyone know the reason Bill Peterson was basically non-existent in the five added episodes over the years after being so prominent in the original episodes?
Anyone know the reason Bill Peterson was basically non-existent in the five added episodes over the years after being so prominent in the original episodes?