He looks skeezy.
Is she grabbing his butt?
Looks like they're both copping a feel in that picture
He looks skeezy.
Is she grabbing his butt?
Guilty.
![]()
Jury sided with Swift...the DJ was ordered to pay a symbolic $1.
Juries do interesting things...
She only sued for $1. I think it was more to make a statement.Jury sided with Swift...the DJ was ordered to pay a symbolic $1.
Juries do interesting things...
She only sued for $1. I think it was more to make a statement.
Do you think her attorney will take his two quarters out of that?
She only sued for $1. I think it was more to make a statement.
Do you think her attorney will take his two quarters out of that?
The news article I read stated that she was suing for $1 before the jury made their decision.I presume her pleadings were open ended with respect to the amount of damages. When the damages are non-economic, most state courts allow you to plead (i.e., the words contained in the plaintiff's complaint or, in this case, counter-petition) it terms like: "an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of the Court." A jury is free to put down whatever amount they feel that the evidence supports. Here, it looks like the jury felt that she had been groped, but that she had not suffered any damages. Presumably, the fact that she is very rich and he was already fired and probably will not work again affected their decision.
Ok, I have not read up on her trial. Often times, the paper will write that the plaintiff is asking for some sum ($1,000,000) when it is really just a pleading to satisfy jurisdiction and not the actual damages sought. But she may have very well been trying this case on principles.
Donald Trump and the USFL won their anti-trust suit against the NFL, but the jury awarded Trump $3 (well, $1 from the jury which was trebled by statute) - even though he was asking for billions. Juries do weird things.
Well, that and all future earnings in his chosen profession. Still would ya?So, essentially, it cost $1 to grope her... would ya?
Well, that and all future earnings in his chosen profession. Still would ya?
I'd want change back.So, essentially, it cost $1 to grope her... would ya?
Wasn't loss of future earnings the basis of his claim?Like I said earlier... truly doubting that his future earnings will be negatively impacted by this. Plenty of XM channels or mid-size markets he'll be able to latch on to and listeners to his program that will call in just to bash him or whatnot.
Wasn't loss of future earnings the basis of his claim?
Don't know. Never even played a lawyer in TV.Would that stand ground only if he won his suit? Genuinely asking and not attempting to be standoffish.
Wendy
For the record I don't condone unwanted touching
I was just joking around in LR fashion, or at least what was normal in the days of the old LR
Sorry to upset you, didn't mean to
But, answer this and it's my last post in this thread
If it was so bad why didn't she turn and slap the crap out of him?
Do you realize that if he actually did this, and she just let it go then she has become an enabler, right?
This is a civil trial, he sued and she countered
I am having a hard time understanding your getting upset about some LR fun when it appears mrs swift wasn't too offended by his actions, she should of had him arrested on the spot
Man, I miss the old LR