The issue as we see it is not the immediate reversion of the property to the public but the ability or inability to renourish these private beaches. If it's done using federal funds, the property reverts to the public. I would imagine county officials will not allow them to drive across public lands to get sand there without a total revolt by the citizens. So the question is, how do they do it? Going over the primary dune will require all kinds of permits. Will those owners just throw in the towel?Here's the deal -
Classically privately owned land area lost to erosion, as demarcated by mean high tide, reverts to public ownership. But that is not true in the case of lands lost by avulsion or sudden typically storm related erosion in which case private ownership is retained over the now, but probably not forever, underwater lands.
It seems to me that with climate change and sea level rise avulsion is the new erosion. As "private" beach or waterfront development gets washed away from either routine erosion or routine storm related erosion, the water area properly goes to the public.
In this context the converse should hold too; any lands added by accretion should be considered avulsional, less likely to naturally recur, and not automatically owned by the adjacent property.
Walton County would be perfect lead; it's not like local beach issues have not reached both the Florida and US Supreme Courts.
Let me know how it goes.