Thank you. I try to stay informed, and I typically research for accuracy before posting, since I think being sloppy and spreading misinformation, even on a sports site, is super harmful to our society. Some things slip by, like I had no clue who Dylan was, but I do my best.
I didn't either until the whole Bud Lite thing came up. I only knew because a bar was selling it for 2 bucks a bottle and I made the mistake of asking the Facebook informed bartender why.
I've avoided the word concession since the spring game fiasco..... No excuse whatsoever.
"And that's the way it is!" Cronkite was the best! Rather was addicted to the red light of the camera.
Well Don was past his prime so.....
Thoughts on Tucker Carlson's Firing - The Last Refuge
This is a context you won’t find elsewhere {smiles}. The phone has been blowing up…. Context and some details matter. First, Carlson was being paid about $20 million a year by Murdoch. He had about 3 years left on his contract and will be paid the full contract amount. Carlson found out about...theconservativetreehouse.com
Fox Stock is already down $1Billion and still sinking.
Eye of Sauron is a reference to The Lord of the rings. Red till males VS blue pill males is a reference to terms thrown a lot in what was called the manosphere on the internet. Reference to the movie The matrix. Which pill will you take?
That explains why I haven't heard of those. Haven't seen either movie. I'm sure there's a political connotation in there somewhere though. (not from you)
Not sure its still sinking. It took a hit early but its holding steady. I was hoping for a bigger tumble to get in before it rises again.
LOL. We've got to get you a girlfriend!There was a wet t-shirt contest and I missed it? Bummer!
babylonbee.com
But yet the OP.....
All of the cable networks -- Fox, MSNBC, CNN and all of the rest -- seek to pander and appeal to their subscribers. You know, just like this site -- and its competitors -- seek to appease and attract Nole fans. No reasonable person has ever suggested otherwise. The Court did not say that Rachel Maddow or Don Lemon are reliable truth-tellers.
I don’t watch either network but I don’t agree at all. If Warchant or The Osceola started making up stories to support FSU not many on here would stand for that. Hell, look at the criticism Michael L gets for being sometimes overly optimistic about recruiting and that’s a super subjective topic.All of the cable networks -- Fox, MSNBC, CNN and all of the rest -- seek to pander and appeal to their subscribers. You know, just like this site -- and its competitors -- seek to appease and attract Nole fans. No reasonable person has ever suggested otherwise. The Court did not say that Rachel Maddow or Don Lemon are reliable truth-tellers.
Some people are happy enough to be spoon fed. The truth be damned. This is largely why we are in our current state.
Go back and look at how the FSU, uf and um sites addressed the Willie Taggart hire (just as an isolated example). The FSU writers were gushing over the alleged brilliance of the hire. The competitors were literally laughing their asses off at the absurdity of the decision.
Were MSNBC or CNN sued in the same manner as Fox News forcing their attorneys to say that? Please cite the case.All of the cable networks -- Fox, MSNBC, CNN and all of the rest -- seek to pander and appeal to their subscribers. You know, just like this site -- and its competitors -- seek to appease and attract Nole fans. No reasonable person has ever suggested otherwise. The Court did not say that Rachel Maddow or Don Lemon are reliable truth-tellers.
You also gushed like many of us despite later contrived screen names. At the moment it was a universally well thought of hire. Not sure what your point is here.
I was pleased to have anyone other than Fisher. You know, the jackass whom you zealously defended until the last minute because you did not know the guy, and had no idea what you were talking about.
Not aware of one. But the point remains that the same analysis that was used in the Fox case would apply to MSNBC or CNN. And you can bet your ass the lawyers defending MSNBC or CNN would have described their “talent” the same way the Fox lawyers described Carlson.
The point is sometimes that people are wrong with their opinions but refuse to admit it. Their go to is irrational hatred towards anyone that questions their opinion.
There is an unconfirmed report that Tucker is switching panties. Again.
Lemon got fired because no one watched him; Tucker got fired because a lot of people watched him.Please tell me this is just a facetious joke.
You know he’s got his audience in the palm of his carnival barker hands when Fox’s own attorneys argue that no reasonable viewer should believe him, and yet his legions of fans insist he’s a “standup truth teller” lol
Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously
Tucker Carlson has a long history of making racist and controversial statements as a primetime host on Fox News.www.businessinsider.com
