3 girl sports that I love to watch are soccer, softball and volleyball. Cant stand to watch a man play them.
I don't go out of my way, but watching the US v Canada softball mens games is pretty interesting.
3 girl sports that I love to watch are soccer, softball and volleyball. Cant stand to watch a man play them.
I don't go out of my way, but watching the US v Canada softball mens games is pretty interesting.
mother of god, the end of the first half for the Saints vs. Falcons game was a lecture of rules. I appreciate that football and all of its many rules, delays, timeouts, etc. pull at our Puritan heart strings...but the sport is terrible
Basketball is worse with timeouts, replay reviews, intentional fouling.
I recall a Maryland game (they were still in the ACC at that time) that was on before one of our games was to come on TV. It was 2:55 with the game to start at 3 PM. There were 28 seconds. Game will get over in plenty of time I thought. At 3:11 the game ended. Sixteen minutes to play 28 seconds. That was absurd.
Mrs BFT hates the end of NBA games more so because as she says, two minutes left in the game? It will over in 30 minutes.
That's why both college and nba have both reduced team time outs in the game with the hopes of ending these endless last 2 minutes. I have often said the best part of a good close basketball is from the 6-7 minute time down to about 2 minutes left.
To be fair, its mostly the endless intentional fouling, not timeouts. Burn 3 seconds for 4 minutes of shooting 2 free throws. Not sure how to regulate that.
Soccer may actually be one of the few sports that ends within 4 mins of when expected 100% of the time (excluding overtime matches in tournament play).
Are free throws not part of the game? Make them and the strategy doesn't work.Give the fouled team the option of keeping the ball or shooting the free throws. It's ridiculous that a team can win a game based on their ability to commit fouls and shoot free throws. It would be like the NFL deciding games on dueling field goals or soccer with their shootouts. And the ability for force a field goal or a shoot out depended on how often the opposing team fouled you.
I remember Phi Slamma Jamma (Houston Cougars) in the early 80s who were the superior team to NC but lost (like Miami to Penn State in football, but Penn State couldn't foul Miami to get the ball back). The NC victory was a result of an intentional foul.
Are free throws not part of the game? Make them and the strategy doesn't work.
On Saturday, BC beat Duke in part because they made all their free throws down the stretch.
Except that's outside of the rules of the game.The equivalent would be forcing a football team into a field goal attempt with loss of possession by intentionally fouling them.
I don't know if football is boring; but I noticed a couple of decades ago when I started playing rugby that the games take forever. When I started playing and watching rugby and then watched football I realized I cold get a ton of other things done while a football game was on; not so much when a rugby game was on.
If I was an nfl owner, I’d certainly be looking to sell my franchise now.When you think about it football is an absurdly slow and tedious sport.
Example: Whole drives are spent with no goal other than to win "the battle of field position" and hope that eventually someone else falters into you scoring because you lack the faith in your offense to be able generate points on its own.
All the while there's a 30 second stoppage in play every 12 seconds in addition to stoppages for referees to enforce extremely technical and complex rules every 5-6 plays.
I love the sport but can't help but wonder why when I step back and assess it for what it is, a slow, plodding, brutally violent sport. Beyond the relying on the bogus idea of tradition, I have no idea how it'll sustain itself through another generation or two.
When the ReliableOstrich speaks wealthy old men listen.If I was an nfl owner, I’d certainly be looking to sell my franchise now.
When the ReliableOstrich speaks wealthy old men listen.
For bitcoinIf I was an nfl owner, I’d certainly be looking to sell my franchise now.
I will just make more babies.Go stick your head in the sand. I eat your babies in oversized omelettes.
When you think about it football is an absurdly slow and tedious sport.
Example: Whole drives are spent with no goal other than to win "the battle of field position" and hope that eventually someone else falters into you scoring because you lack the faith in your offense to be able generate points on its own.
All the while there's a 30 second stoppage in play every 12 seconds in addition to stoppages for referees to enforce extremely technical and complex rules every 5-6 plays.
I love the sport but can't help but wonder why when I step back and assess it for what it is, a slow, plodding, brutally violent sport. Beyond the relying on the bogus idea of tradition, I have no idea how it'll sustain itself through another generation or two.
The funny thing about soccer is that there's a fairly hefty partisan divide over the love of the sports based on some studies. The strongly conservative crowd tends to hate it while liberals are far more likely to love soccer. It is funny as I have noticed my attitude towards soccer change as my political beliefs did. I used to be in the football is awesome, soccer is the worst sport in the world crowd when I was a staunch conservative. As my beliefs have slid more towards liberalism I've also found that my acceptance of the sport began to grow until I now love the sport.
Social Scientists theorize that Conservatives hate it because it is such a global sport and are far more apt to enjoy sports that only America excels at or invented. There's a bend towards an automatic hatred of soccer because of it's global appeal (And also because we're not naturally the best).
Liberals tend to like the sport more for those same reasons and are slowly distancing themselves from football because of it's more brutal/violent nature. Liberals think globalism is a good thing, are less likely to be America first, and also more open to changing ideas and embracing things such as sports that are not traditionally strong.
I'm not making an argument as to which is which (And there's obviously some conservatives who love it and some liberals who hate it) I just find it an interesting case study on how our tribal identities shape so many things that we enjoy.
Now, as for soccer in general; I think it's like any sport. If you don't understand how the sport works, how plays unfold, how momentum swings, how strategies are in play then it's going to seem like a bunch of idiots just kicking a ball around and faking injuries. I think the same is true as football. You try to get someone who doesn't understand football to watch it and they're going to say it's boring, constant stoppage, too complex, etc... If they take some time with people who truly understand the sport to explain how the game works, and if they can build an allegiance to a team they often become converts.
That's the same with soccer. The more I learn about the game (And I'm still at a very low level of understanding) the more I love it. And truth be told if the only soccer you're watching is youth soccer or MLS (Even though I'm a big MLS fan) you're going to hate it. When the game is played at a high level, it can be absolutely beautiful to watch plays develop and move. When Spain was at their height a while back, their play style of quick/precise passes that tore defenses apart and moved quickly was some of the most amazing soccer I'd ever seen and one of the most amazing things I'd ever watched in sports.
I think your attention spans are just shortening. There have been fantastic NFL games all year long this season. The Pittsburgh/Ravens game on Monday was great.
I think your attention spans are just shortening. There have been fantastic NFL games all year long this season. The Pittsburgh/Ravens game on Monday was great.