I'm sorry, but I thought the thread was about sawmills. My Bad.And the turbines will improve in design.
I'm sorry, but I thought the thread was about sawmills. My Bad.And the turbines will improve in design.
I'd still look into it. We had trees around our house, but the winds would come down the hill through the back yard. And, then of course, August in the NE, no wind at all unless there's a storm.We live on a small hillside with often strong winds, more often steady winds. The problem is that trees above us on neighboring properties slow the winds enough to make our ground not “windy” enough to justify a small turbine.
Dang, I wish we could, I wish we could.
Generate the juice locally, as cleanly as possible. Kudos to Barnstable for negotiating new utility upgrades in conjunction with the needed line installations.So I did a little more research, as I remember very well when Ted Kennedy opposed wind turbines, and I found this. It gives a little history.
It is true that Yacht Clubs were all initially opposed, and one of the arguments was that it would interfere with their racing. Wealthy homeowners were concerned about the "view".
Cape Cod Offshore Wind Moves Ahead — Despite Controversy - CleanTechnica
This article is about the Cape Cod offshore wind project located 15 miles off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard.cleantechnica.com
I've been a Larry Bird fan (no blades) for many years! He migrated from Indiana to Boston and then nested back in his hometown of French Licker. He's by far, the greatest Bird that I have ever seen. Was there in 1985 in Nawlins when he scored 60 points. And I'm all in for protecting all birds. He was/is the best trash talker the league as ever seen and was Mr. Clutch when you needed a bucket.The American Bird Conservancy estimates that well over half a million birds of all sizes and species die each year as a result of the wind turbines AND the utility lines used to carry the power they generate.
Out west they tend to inflict casualties on the larger birds including the California Condor.
I wish they would develop and install something around the blades that would protect the birds, like the blades of a fan.
The Bird.I've been a Larry Bird fan (no blades) for many years! He migrated from Indiana to Boston and then nested back in his hometown of French Licker. He's by far, the greatest Bird that I have ever seen. Was there in 1985 in Nawlins when he scored 60 points. And I'm all in for protecting all birds. He was/is the best trash talker the league as ever seen and was Mr. Clutch when you needed a bucket.
Nope! As long as there is water to the level at the top of the glass it will not over flow.
When you build a city below sea level what do you expect will happen?
I am not for oil or coal fired power plants as I stated above.. New nuclear is likely the best choice.
Actually, on the assumption that warming continues there will more plant growth in places like Greenland. More warming more evaporation and rainfall.
Enjoy your life. Living in fear is not a good way to live.
Matter can change form through physical and chemical changes, but through any of these changes matter is conserved. The same amount of matter exists before and after the change—none is created or destroyed. This concept is called the Law of Conservation of Mass.
Very cool article. Thanks for sharing that. It's already happening in Miami.Rising seas will cut off many properties before they’re flooded
Along the US coasts, many properties will lose access to essential services.arstechnica.com
My favorite lobstah and clam joint in the Northeast gets cut off often from “high ground”. I despair that it will become more often…Very cool article. Thanks for sharing that. It's already happening in Miami.
Many times during Nor'easters, I could not get on the Post Road (1), because it was flooded in CosCob. I had to drive north up to the parkway just to go to Stamford.My favorite lobstah and clam joint in the Northeast gets cut off often from “high ground”. I despair that it will become more often…
https://www.woodmans.com https://arstechnica.com/science/202...cut-off-many-properties-beforetheyre-flooded/
They get caught up with the sharks.I'm more interested in knowing how whales and porpoises fly into the turbine blades.
Where is this happening in Miami?Very cool article. Thanks for sharing that. It's already happening in Miami.
I'm not sure, because I don't know Miami that well, I read several articles, and I believe one was from the Miami Herald that I can no longer access. The article that I read involved a trailer park that was becoming waterfront property, thus the owner of the land, tripled the land rental, thus causing people to have to move, even if they owned their trailers and had lived there for years.Where is this happening in Miami?
Yes, Sir! They will indeed!And the turbines will improve in design.
Why do I have a sudden craving for Whataburger? Patty Melts are good, too.That’s almost “whataboutism”.
Unfortunately, icebergs and glaciers contain a lot of water that’s above sea level. Bears no resemblance to ice cubes.Nope! As long as there is water to the level at the top of the glass it will not over flow.
When you build a city below sea level what do you expect will happen?
I am not for oil or coal fired power plants as I stated above.. New nuclear is likely the best choice.
Actually, on the assumption that warming continues there will more plant growth in places like Greenland. More warming more evaporation and rainfall.
Enjoy your life. Living in fear is not a good way to live.
Matter can change form through physical and chemical changes, but through any of these changes matter is conserved. The same amount of matter exists before and after the change—none is created or destroyed. This concept is called the Law of Conservation of Mass.
so, you throw around the terms “after tax credit”. That is implying that there is not a cost to the tax credit. Just get the government to pay for it and all will be good. NOTAccording to Solar.com a 7.6 kWh system would set you back between 10 and 13k after tax incentives. This would pay for itself in 7 or so years depending on usage and returns from the power company. You can get no or low cost solar but some companies have different terms on payments and returns from the power company.
A neighbor of mine paid a company 478 a month for 10 years. They did keep the tax credit but not the returns from the power company. Got to do a lot of research.
Also important is how efficient your house is. The more efficient the higher returns you see and you pay the panels off quicker.
No the cost listed is after tax credits so the cost outlay would be higher than 12k initially.so, you throw around the terms “after tax credit”. That is implying that there is not a cost to the tax credit. Just get the government to pay for it and all will be good. NOT
so, you throw around the terms “after tax credit”. That is implying that there is not a cost to the tax credit. Just get the government to pay for itAccording to Solar.com a 7.6 kWh system would set you back between 10 and 13k after tax incentives. This would pay for itself in 7 or so years depending on usage and returns from the power company. You can get no or low cost solar but some companies have different terms on payments and returns from the power company.
A neighbor of mine paid a company 478 a month for 10 years. They did keep the tax credit but not the returns from the power company. Got to do a lot of research.
Also important is how efficient your house is. The more efficient the higher returns you see and you pay the panels off quicker.
my point being is that someone is subsidizing the credit. It’s not the government (just us other citizens paying for the subsidy). Just print more money as the solutionNo the cost listed is after tax credits so the cost outlay would be higher than 12k initially.
That is correct. I wasn’t pushing anything just stating the posted costs and available programs. The post was in response to another about low costs.so, you throw around the terms “after tax credit”. That is implying that there is not a cost to the tax credit. Just get the government to pay for it
my point being is that someone is subsidizing the credit. It’s not the government (just us other citizens paying for the subsidy). Just print more money as the solution
??Silly.
Ice is ice? Glaciers are land locked and would raise water levels when melted.Unfortunately, icebergs and glaciers contain a lot of water that’s above sea level. Bears no resemblance to ice cubes.
6-8 inches in over 70 years is a lot different 6-8 feet!I'm not sure, because I don't know Miami that well, I read several articles, and I believe one was from the Miami Herald that I can no longer access. The article that I read involved a trailer park that was becoming waterfront property, thus the owner of the land, tripled the land rental, thus causing people to have to move, even if they owned their trailers and had lived there for years.
But, here's an article on the rising waters.
Florida's Sea Level Is Rising
Sea levels around Florida have risen up to 8 inches since 1950, and are now rising as much as 1 inch every 3 years, mainly due to a slowing Gulf Stream. Because of sea level rise, tidal flooding in some areas of the state has increased by 352% since 2000, and communities are spending over $4...sealevelrise.org
Until the battery and range issues for electric cars are sorted out I'm going to pass. However, I am a fan of utilizing existing sources to power, heat and cool your home. The thing is it needs to start with efficiency. Lower the electric bills first by making your home more efficient. That will get more in your pocket when you go solar.??
I was a advocate of electric cars, solar panels and wind farms until one considers the toxic waste produced over time. Small windmills for individual homes and same with solar panels seem like the best choice environmentally.
Oh and for a completely frozen glass of water to the brim the water level would go down after melting. Frozen water less dense.
AgreeUntil the battery and range issues for electric cars are sorted out I'm going to pass. However, I am a fan of utilizing existing sources to power, heat and cool your home. The thing is it needs to start with efficiency. Lower the electric bills first by making your home more efficient. That will get more in your pocket when you go solar.
If your like me and use an average of 750kwh a month over the last year that's about $150 a month on average. A 7.6kwh system can produce 29kwh per day which would easily cover your monthly usage. At this rate it would pay for itself in 7 years. This doesn't include any net metering or other incentives. Careful though there are some rip offs out there.Agree
Insulated my home electric bill $125-150 a month from Oct to June. Solar too expensive. I'll be dead before I break even.
That was my point. Ice that’s below the surface shouldn’t raise levels.Ice is ice? Glaciers are land locked and would raise water levels when melted.
That was my point. Ice that’s below the surface shouldn’t raise levels.
Water expands when it freezes. Ice has more volume (takes up more space) than water but has less density (floats).I can't count the number of times I left a beer in the freezer overnight and the the can leaked .and I had beer slush in my freezer. Seems like water expands as it gets warmer. At least in some situations.
Just because it's the same substance doesn't mean it's density can't vary.
7 YEARS. I read that solar panels have to be replaced every 10 years. Of course google says 25-30 years, What is the truth? Anyone have a solar powered home over 10 years?If your like me and use an average of 750kwh a month over the last year that's about $150 a month on average. A 7.6kwh system can produce 29kwh per day which would easily cover your monthly usage. At this rate it would pay for itself in 7 years. This doesn't include any net metering or other incentives. Careful though there are some rip offs out there.
Any easy way to tell is from the warranty. Most solar manufacturers warranty is 25 years so the 25-30 years is probably about right.7 YEARS. I read that solar panels have to be replaced every 10 years. Of course google says 25-30 years, What is the truth? Anyone have a solar powered home over 10 years?
Any easy way to tell is from the warranty. Most solar manufacturers warranty is 25 years so the 25-30 years is probably about right.
LOL........China sources its electricity from coal and is building more coal fired plants.How do you know what China and India have done? They are both racing to embrace non fossil energy.
China is bypassing hybrid cars and instead leading the electric car implementation.
I don't see a difference.Hey there, I'm new to this forum, but I couldn't help but chime in on this topic. It's a bummer that they can cause harm to birds and bats, and even contribute to population declines. As for solar energy, I had no idea about the hazardous waste it produces. But have you heard about ground level solar panels? They're a newer technology that doesn't require massive land areas like traditional solar farms. Overall, I think it's important to weigh the pros and cons of any energy source and continue to strive for more sustainable solutions.
The I-10 corridor between Jax and Tally is filling up with enormous acreage on both sides full of solar collection panels- owned by FPL, Duke Energy or Southern Companies. They’ve replaced agricultural plantings.I don't see a difference.
China is a worldwide leader in moving away from fossils, while still building coal plants to serve immediate needs.LOL........China sources its electricity from coal and is building more coal fired plants.
Is that the only future energy moves that China is making?LOL........China sources its electricity from coal and is building more coal fired plants.