Statistically, my money is on no.
How long did the SR71, B2 or F117 fly before anyone knew what they were? How many UFO sightings can be attributed to experimental aircraft or drones. My main point is that if there is technology we know about the is surely something more advanced we don’t know about.
Reflection = image and something to put in the database. Along with DNA they could get a real good idea who they were looking for.
Not a F14 guy but I that is a TCS camera that gives a view of what is in front of the aircraft. In most cases these were able to be slaved to the radar as well. The other pods on the front would be FLIR, ECM and or RTWS sensors.
There is one poster here who would call you a freak for doing that. Seriously.
But if someone fails to speak a deity’s name while harvesting your food, is refusing to eat it superstitious nonsense, or do you find it somehow meaningful?
Yeah, Tiseo could be slaved to the radar also. Worked great for combat dart to make sure we were locked on to the dart and not the tow plane.
That would be handy. Don't want to be that dude that shoots down a full scale drone when your not supposed to.
Having observant Jews as neighbors for many years I’ve known about “keeping Kosher” for decades. If the suspect’s family is Jewish it could be an offshoot of that custom.
What does someone finding meaning in superstitious nonsense mean to you?
Is this like believing that organic food is more than just a label and higher price? I really don't know either way but I guess if you believe its truly better for you then in a way it still is.
It means as long as it’s no skin off my nose I respect your right to believe what you want.
Unfortunately, some people find more value in judging those people based on their own beliefs.
Drone? We used our F-4s and towed the dart on a 1000' cable. Radar had a tendency to lock on to the dart and then transfer up the cable. With Tiseo, I could glance at the radar and make sure I saw the dart and not an F-4.
Tyndall has a drone squadron of old F-4 and F-16 jets painted orange. Same concept as the old combat dart but it was an actual plane.Drone? We used our F-4s and towed the dart on a 1000' cable. Radar had a tendency to lock on to the dart and then transfer up the cable. With Tiseo, I could glance at the radar and make sure I saw the dart and not an F-4.
Its the whole believe what I believe or your wrong thing. It happens both ways but some are more extreme than others.
My F4E 74-1041 was one of those airplanes. I believe it is now resting on the bottom of the Gulf.
a la Theodore Robert Bundy in related to his education and crime.
Thanks for the FBI National Dragnet Scoop. Are you Deep Throat from Watergate? What did the President know and when did he know it? Asking for a friend in the federal witness protection program. Thanks.
This is the amount of the evidence they felt necessary to obtain the warrant. It'll be interesting to see what else they have.
Phones periodically check in to find the closest cell phone tower.
Yeah I just mean I’m not sure how “near” that means. Those towers don’t pinpoint someone’s exact location unless I’m mistaken. Regardless it’s good evidence and also his phone was turned off at the time of the murders. Sure seems like they got their man.
Ive heard from IT folks that stuff like that can still be tracked for up to 24 hours as certain components retain a residual charge. Not sure if this is actually used but I would imagine it is.
www.makeuseof.com
People voluntarily put their information on line. Vacation, home or not, status updates ect... They dont even need a tracker in many cases.
Yeah, I would imagine there is more they are reserving for trial. Idaho has the death penalty so Im sure its on the table.
Under Phase II, the FCC requires wireless carriers, within six months of a valid request by a PSAP, to begin providing information that is more precise to PSAPs, specifically, the latitude and longitude of the caller. This information must meet FCC accuracy standards, generally to within 50 to 300 meters, depending on the type of technology used.
Saying, “I went to Cancun on vacation” is nothing like the constant trail of digital breadcrumbs your phone leaves wherever you go, all the time.
Not sure I agree that it’s not much at all. Would he be convicted on just this so far? Ehhh, depends. But being able to track his car leaving his area of residence at like 2:30a all the way to the crime scene, and then speeding away from the crime scene and back to his area of residence perfectly in the timeline is something. Especially when his DNA is the only DNA on the sheath of a knife. At this point it’s hard to believe it’s not him. Which doesn’t mean he’d be convicted for sure obviously.
I think it’s questionable right now. Chances are you’ll never have a motive or witness. And unless he’s stupid they wont find the murder weapon. I think they’ll need more to establish who he was type of thing.
www.vox.com
Really good.Good summary.
The Idaho student murders just got even scarier
What the Idaho student murder investigation tells us about how criminal justice should work.
Thanks for sharing. Perfectly summarizes it all.Good summary.
The Idaho student murders just got even scarier
What the Idaho student murder investigation tells us about how criminal justice should work.
Good summary.
The Idaho student murders just got even scarier
What the Idaho student murder investigation tells us about how criminal justice should work.
