refuted, but where does the coach go to get his reputation back?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...astner-sexual-assault-claims-false/668795002/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...astner-sexual-assault-claims-false/668795002/
This coach should really sue the ass off the accuser; but, no, the Nerd School will want him to just let everything go away with no paying attention.
As long as it can be 100% proven that it's a false accusation. Otherwise you're going to have situations where a woman has been assaulted, finally comes clean but the person she accuses has a much better lawyer, he's found not guilty and then he tries to punish her for dare speaking out by pushing for her to go to jail. Talk about silencing victims.Suing will likely net nothing but more negative publicity. False accusers should go to jail.
To end a false accuser to jail, you'd have to try them, and in doing so you'd have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a) the accusation was false and b) the accuser made the accusation knowing it was false.Suing will likely net nothing but more negative publicity. False accusers should go to jail.
Sounds similarly difficult to trying to prove a sexual assault did in fact occur.To end a false accuser to jail, you'd have to try them, and in doing so you'd have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a) the accusation was false and b) the accuser made the accusation knowing it was false.
Which by default would be a trial of the accused as well.
Not sure if the GT fella really wants to go that route or just let things simmer down.
You're right, of course, but I would think the process is already underway, regardless of his filing a defamation suit. It appears clear that she filed a false police report and gave false testimony to investigators under oath. Perjury. If she is convicted of those charges, I would think she would spend jail time. If not that is where the laws need to be modified to set higher jail sentencing for knowing filing a false police report and committing perjury in support of a knowingly false complaint of a felony.To end a false accuser to jail, you'd have to try them, and in doing so you'd have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a) the accusation was false and b) the accuser made the accusation knowing it was false.
Which by default would be a trial of the accused as well.
Not sure if the GT fella really wants to go that route or just let things simmer down.
I think the perjury charge would be the right and easier charge to go after as it doesn't require disproving the entirety of the allegation.You're right, of course, but I would think the process is already underway, regardless of his filing a defamation suit. It appears clear that she filed a false police report and gave false testimony to investigators under oath. Perjury. If she is convicted of those charges, I would think she would spend jail time. If not that is where the laws need to be modified to set higher jail sentencing for knowing filing a false police report and committing perjury in support of a knowingly false complaint of a felony.
There are stats out that exaggerate either side of the issue. There is one that claims 1 in 4 college girls are sexually assaulted (it's repeated a lot but stems from one survey) and there is also a study that found nearly half the claims of sexual assault are false. Both sides push the extreme examples and the truth lies somewhere in between.I think it's also worth considering for every "false" claim that goes out, there are likely 100 claims that should be made that never are. It's the same as when I hear people complaining about reverse discrimination who don't realize that for every time you see a minority get a job you felt was undeserved due to affirmative action that there are literally hundreds if not thousands of times the reverse has happened before that law.
It's not perfect, and people who make false claims here are damaging women and men and should be prosecuted, but let's not pretend like this is some rampant thing that women are just constantly using false claims as a weapon.
It's also like when I hear people claim that hate crimes/racism only work in one direction. Clearly the statistics don't support that.I think it's also worth considering for every "false" claim that goes out, there are likely 100 claims that should be made that never are. It's the same as when I hear people complaining about reverse discrimination who don't realize that for every time you see a minority get a job you felt was undeserved due to affirmative action that there are literally hundreds if not thousands of times the reverse has happened before that law.
It's not perfect, and people who make false claims here are damaging women and men and should be prosecuted, but let's not pretend like this is some rampant thing that women are just constantly using false claims as a weapon.
Good postThe 1 in 4 statistic is completely bogus and people really hurt their cases when they use those types of statistics to bolster their case. But it doesn't mean it's not a really big problem. The stat I've seen that seemed more realistic was 1 in 10 women had been assaulted in some way. The 1 in 4 stat included women who regretted it the next day but were not coerced in any manner. Making a bad decision isn't assault even though some would like it to be.
With that said, it's still a huge problem that our country has not only ignored, but silently allowed for far too long. We'll likely see the pendulum swing a bit too far in the other direction while we try to course correct, but that's the process with any major course correction. I'm just happy to finally see people being held accountable. I'm especially happy to see that even the church is facing it as I was convinced they'd be able to continue to sweep it under the rug. They're trying, but things like the Paige Patterson issue with the SBC are forcing it into the open.