ADVERTISEMENT

Does the Locker Room Need Lurker

Does the Locker Room NEED Brian aka Lurker

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.

DFSNOLE

Ultimate Seminole Insider
Gold Member
Sep 25, 2002
46,344
25,759
1,853
DeFuniak Springs Country Club
To quote the twice permabanned Free Spirit-Brian-Lurker;

"Not all of my posts are stupid; many get hundreds of views and turn into multipage threads. I'm trying to generate some discussion on this board because it's dreadfully dull and boring because of overmoderating.

The LR is a shell of it's former self and it's sad how far it's fallen.

I assure you there are many other old time posters that feel the same way; many of them don't even bother to post here anymore.

If you want to ban me for speaking the truth about how far the LR has fallen, go ahead...whatever makes you feel good about yourself is fine with me..."


This is not my board, apparently, I just over moderate it. So, denizens of the Locker Room, you decide his fate.
 
I'm pro-Lurker/Free-Spirit.

I think his threads aren't problematic, and that people do end up responding to them. There's probably a point of diminishing returns, but they don't bother me.

I also don't think there's a moderation problem.
 
He could slow down on the thread creation, I find myself rolling my eyes when I login and see 1/3 of the threads are his, however; at the same time I find one or two that are nteresting and end up posting in.

With that said:

giphy.gif
 
LOL it looks like @DFSNOLE's biased poll may be backfiring on him.

He called me an "ass" because I posted that soccer sucks in another thread. He personally insults me on a near daily basis, which doesn't bother me except for his glaring hypocrisy.

If anyone insulted him the way he does to others, he'd ban them in a minute.

The LR doesn't "need" any particular individual (except for Russ, perhaps) :)
 
Last edited:
Is Lurker annoying? Yes
Should Lurker be banned just for being annoying? No

Lurker should be banned because he has been banned in the past with a different username. I thought it was against the rules to create new usernames and come back. If you want to let him back then send a blast email to all the other perma-banned people and let them know they are free to come back with a different username.

Also, for those that find him annoying and don't want to read his stuff, don't read it...ignore him.
 
LOL it looks like @DFSNOLE's biased poll may be backfiring on him.

He called me an "ass" because I posted that soccer sucks in another thread. He personally insults me on a near daily basis, which doesn't bother me except for his glaring hypocrisy.

If anyone insulted him the way he does to others, he'd ban them in a minute.

The LR doesn't "need" any particular individual (except for Russ, perhaps) :)
I learned long ago that no one is untouchable, no matter how rich, attractive, and charming I/they might be. I think there's a lot of room here to create threads, have conversations, and joke around. But still, it's rarely a good idea to poke the bear - you'd be better off just accepting that everyone has differences, accepting them, and being yourself - without being an exaggerated version of yourself.
 
I don't need much of anything. Most people on here don't either, so my vote is no just by logic.

I add that if any individual bristles and finds their ego in being a message board "controversy" then they could probably do with finding other ways to spend their free time...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker1999
LOL it looks like @DFSNOLE's biased poll may be backfiring on him.

He called me an "ass" because I posted that soccer sucks in another thread. He personally insults me on a near daily basis, which doesn't bother me except for his glaring hypocrisy.

If anyone insulted him the way he does to others, he'd ban them in a minute.

The LR doesn't "need" any particular individual (except for Russ, perhaps) :)

Why would anyone want to insult DFS though?

His poll wasn’t biased, it was a fair question. I do struggle as to whether I like you on the board, you can be overbearing at times.

His point that you have been permanently band twice prior is reason enough to permanently ban you again. But he is taking the democratic approach to your fate and then of course you choose to lash out at him with aligations of him picking on you without cause...it’s that kind of stuff that keeps you in trouble.

You have to learn when to hold em’, know when to fold em’....
 
Why would anyone want to insult DFS though?

His poll wasn’t biased, it was a fair question. I do struggle as to whether I like you on the board, you can be overbearing at times.

His point that you have been permanently band twice prior is reason enough to permanently ban you again. But he is taking the democratic approach to your fate and then of course you choose to lash out at him with aligations of him picking on you without cause...it’s that kind of stuff that keeps you in trouble.

You have to learn when to hold em’, know when to fold em’....


The word "NEED" makes the poll biased.

Of course, the LR doesn't "need" any of us to exist or function.

A more fair poll would be: "Should I ban Lurker because I want to?"

That'd be fair.
 
Last edited:
I like @DFSNOLE I would have a Mich Ultra with him at a tailgate. He's a fair moderator and should be an example for some of the bad ones on here. Witht that said, I think Brian @Lurker1999 @BrianNole09 is a fantastic soul with a heart of gold and his threads are the best. He never attacks anyone. People tend to attack him. I've seen this played out in the Bible.

Be on the right side of history @DFSNOLE don't allow the critics and their PM's influence you. They need to exercise the ignore button.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker1999
LOL it looks like @DFSNOLE's biased poll may be backfiring on him.

He called me an "ass" because I posted that soccer sucks in another thread. He personally insults me on a near daily basis, which doesn't bother me except for his glaring hypocrisy.

If anyone insulted him the way he does to others, he'd ban them in a minute.

The LR doesn't "need" any particular individual (except for Russ, perhaps) :)
I could ban you "just because I want to" if I so chose. I'm the one who let you back in under certain conditions some of which you're adhering to, others not. Your problem is you're reverting back to what earned you the two previous bans. While the name changes, the poster remains the same.
 
The word "NEED" makes the poll biased.

Of course, the LR doesn't "need" any of us to exist or function.

A more fair poll would be: "Should I ban Lurker because I want to?"

That'd be fair.
Part of what makes you so entertaining is that you're oblivious to criticism. Attacking a mod for doing his job is just plain douch-y.
 
I didn't know you were a mod. My bad, dawg!

What did you do to lose your stripes?

I was a Mod way back years ago. After my daughter was born I didn't have a lot of free time to hang out on Warchant so I gave it up (2006 - 2007 timeframe). Things have drastically changed in the past year+, so I spend a lot more time here again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker1999
I was a Mod way back years ago. After my daughter was born I didn't have a lot of free time to hang out on Warchant so I gave it up (2006 - 2007 timeframe). Things have drastically changed in the past year+, so I spend a lot more time here again.
I see how it goes...Arsenal loses the CL final in 2006 and you disappear.

Now Unai has us on the right track, and you "have a lot more time."

Bandwagoner!!! (I keed, I keed!)
 
I could ban you "just because I want to" if I so chose. I'm the one who let you back in under certain conditions some of which you're adhering to, others not. Your problem is you're reverting back to what earned you the two previous bans. While the name changes, the poster remains the same.

Again, you insult me on an almost daily basis. I rarely respond to your insults.

I'm doing my best to follow the rules. I just find your near daily personal attacks to be highly unprofessional and irrelevant to your job as a moderator.

Of course, you're a moderator and you can do whatever you want, even if it's hypocritical.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 12Nole
Part of what makes you so entertaining is that you're oblivious to criticism. Attacking a mod for doing his job is just plain douch-y.

I'm not attacking a mod for doing his job. I'm merely pointing out the mods torrent of insults against me, which are unprovoked.

I'm very willing to adhere to board rules.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 12Nole
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT