You one-upped me there, for sure.Well, my wife also had a big dog, and red hair, but she also had a diploma from FSU.
You one-upped me there, for sure.Well, my wife also had a big dog, and red hair, but she also had a diploma from FSU.
Her diploma does have some advantages though. When we take her car somewhere, I always tell her to hang it from the rear view mirror so people can see it and be jealous. Then I park in handicapped spots with no problems.Well, my wife also had a big dog, and red hair, but she also had a diploma from FSU.
Damn, sorry I missed this. Yes, there is a correlation, but it's complicated. The more powerful models include location/setting as a coefficient in multiple regression equations or multilevel analyses. Generally, the more the setting includes either an external expectation of success, e.g., church or an arranged marriage, or more intensive/persistent proximity, e.g., workplaces, school, etc., the longer the relationship tends to last.My parents met in college in the late 40s. I met my wife at a bar through friends in 1986. @BrainVision, is there any correlation between where a couple meets and the length of the relationship?
LOL. You cannot make that stuff up.Oh, and my second serious relationship was with a woman with red hair, two large dogs, and a diploma (in Southern Studies) from Ole Miss.
Yep. She almost convinced me to go to Oxford instead of Tallahassee. Her brother ended up being my roommate in Los Angeles.LOL. You cannot make that stuff up.
Yep. She almost convinced me to go to Oxford instead of Tallahassee. Her brother ended up being my roommate in Los Angeles.
Ah the halcyon days of our youth, and the road not taken.Yep. She almost convinced me to go to Oxford instead of Tallahassee. Her brother ended up being my roommate in Los Angeles.
She is not. I am not sure what she is up to these days; I believe she is a stay-at-home mother still living in Alabama.Intriguing plot twist. Is she now your sister in law?
She certainly did, as the older and, as she would have told you with a great degree of pride, much more worldly of the two of us. Yet, I looked down that road as far as I could and <sigh> chose the other. And that has made all the difference…Ah the halcyon days of our youth, and the road not taken.
I’m sure she had her way with you, an innocent young lad from Alabama.
😎😜
So, what if it was simply the sex was great?Damn, sorry I missed this. Yes, there is a correlation, but it's complicated. The more powerful models include location/setting as a coefficient in multiple regression equations or multilevel analyses. Generally, the more the setting includes either an external expectation of success, e.g., church or an arranged marriage, or more intensive/persistent proximity, e.g., workplaces, school, etc., the longer the relationship tends to last.
Sexual satisfaction is a mixed, weak predictor of relationship persistence. In my couples therapy work, I describe it as the barometer of the relationship, as it tends to be an early, sensitive indicator of communication and intimacy problems. Succinctly, bad sex can definitely ruin a relationship, but good sex can not save one.
Interesting and very likely spot on.Sexual satisfaction is a mixed, weak predictor of relationship persistence. In my couples therapy work, I describe it as the barometer of the relationship, as it tends to be an early, sensitive indicator of communication and intimacy problems. Succinctly, bad sex can definitely ruin a relationship, but good sex can not save one.
It depends on how we define "successful," but I think we can say that roughly half of marriages are generally successful.If 40% of marriages end in divorce, what percentage of marriages are successful?
Is it possible to answer that question?
There are definitely differences between younger couples and older couples in the data. One interesting trend: if a younger couple can make it 8+ years with relatively stable marital satisfaction, then they have a great chance of staying together forever. The top three predictors of marital satisfaction are each person's commitment to making the marriage work, their communication skills, and their sense of cohesion and flexibility; in that order.Interesting and very likely spot on.
I do think there is a difference between older couples versus younger marrieds.
I’ve read that there’s been an enormous uptick in “silver divorce” in the last few years and from what I hear and see among my age group it seems to be true.
Boomers got married and had a family, were very busy parenting and having careers and as empty nesters are home alone for the first time in decades sharing a life and a home with a person who is no longer the person they married thirty five years ago. I think that is an enormous adjustment and couples need to be cognizant of that and willing to talk frankly to the person they’ve shared their life with.
It depends on how we define "successful," but I think we can say that roughly half of marriages are generally successful.
Interesting and very likely spot on.
I do think there is a difference between older couples versus younger marrieds.
I’ve read that there’s been an enormous uptick in “silver divorce” in the last few years and from what I hear and see among my age group it seems to be true.
Boomers got married and had a family, were very busy parenting and having careers and as empty nesters are home alone for the first time in decades sharing a life and a home with a person who is no longer the person they married thirty five years ago. I think that is an enormous adjustment and couples need to be cognizant of that and willing to talk frankly to the person they’ve shared their life with.
So true. I tell my wife all the time she needs to lose 30 pounds.
Why am I not at all surprised?So true. I tell my wife all the time she needs to lose 30 pounds.