I saw Mark Schlabach at the local Dicks Sporting Goods store buying camping supplies.Please make this horribleness stop!
Link to full story: https://www.buzzfeed.com/talalansari/jameis-winston?utm_term=.wb63w3Ax8#.mbjkVk3rB
Read article. This isn’t good. That said, it’s also not near the EK story. I suspect you can find a similar story any time you have drunk men with influence/power near any good looking women. That may just be his move to see if a girl will give it up and I bet it usually works.
That doesn’t make it ok. At all. There are some good things about the current spotlight on sexual propriety in the last few years. But we’re also ignoring thousands of years of history where men are usually pigs and women deal with it. It is a good thing to redefine things more clearly and to expect more of men in many situations. But I don’t think it’s right to equate this kind of boorish behavior with rape or turn them into career ending stuff.
And I still hate the idea of the NFL investigating. They are a sports league. They aren’t there to clarify sexual propriety rules for the country. Then again I don’t care because I don’t want anyway.
Not only is FSU present a disaster but our past will now be tarnished also.
I’ll agree but also say facts do matter. And time matters. From Winston’s camps response it seems they’re suggesting someone else may have been in the car. The driver clearly doesn’t know who Winston is. It is possible they used his account and put someone else in there. I do it all the time with my account. I’ll order rides and get people home like that. It’s obvious it’s not me when I put my GF in my Uber, but it’s not as clear when I put a drunk friend in one.If you say you're "waiting for facts" I'm not sure you will ever convict a man of sexual harassment. These crimes, are by nature, almost always "he said, she said" due to the private circumstances in which they typically take place. If this woman was seeking financial gain I think she would have dropped him off and driven straight to the best attorney's office she could find and filed suit within weeks.
It probably happened, he was probably drunk, its terrible behavior regardless of your level of sobriety, and I hope he suffers the full and appropriate wrath that should be rendered a consequence for this choice(s).
The big issue with this for me is, the Uber driver could not identify the one who groped her, but because it was his account used to book the ride, he is the one accused. That makes no sense and does not sit well with me.
Lots of people use their Uber accounts to get friends around. I’m sure it’s even more true when you have Winston’s wealth. That said he would know who it was.Large black man. If his group made a big deal about him being in the one getting a ride - and then that happened - I would google him. I’d be sure that was him. A million photos on google.
That said, if it was NOT him, don’t use HIS Uber account. That’s bad judgement in and of itself.
I’m assuming there’s no video. Do Uber drivers ever have video set up?
Lots of people use their Uber accounts to get friends around. I’m sure it’s even more true when you have Winston’s wealth. That said he would know who it was.
Very nice post.I literally was just having a conversation along these exact same lines with my brother this morning, having not even heard anything about Jameis yet. I absolutely love that women are taking a stand and speaking out against sexual misconduct from their male counterparts - because many of the things they are describing are simply not okay, and shouldn't be moving forward. It's a progressive and productive thing for society. Just because a statute of limitations exists, does not make these acts acceptable.
Where I agree with you 100% is that the media and a seemingly growing portion of our society seem to equate ANY act of sexual misconduct with something horrifying like rape or murder. There are degrees of virtually every crime out there with subsequent varying degrees of charges and punishment, yet for some reason these particular acts are all lumped together and made out to be the worst act(s) a human being can commit against another. I think we're getting a little carried away in that regard.
I will reemphasize, though, that what these women are doing is a good thing, not a bad thing. The acts are unacceptable, period.
And it’s easy to deal with. Say who it was. It WAS his account. Let’s not get silly defending too much. He can clear things up by saying who it was. If he won’t, he will be assumed to have done this. He has no capital on stuff like this.Jameis came out and flag said it was false on his intagram. Telling you guys she probably didn’t even know what jameis looked like.
Not sure that he needs to publicly name his friend who did it, but I'd imagine he will need to name names to NFL security / police when asked.And it’s easy to deal with. Say who it was. It WAS his account. Let’s not get silly defending too much. He can clear things up by saying who it was. If he won’t, he will be assumed to have done this. He has no capital on stuff like this.
100% Correct today , If you're explaining you're losing !!!!!facts rarely change perception
Yes. Yes he does. If he expects the public to have ANY confidence in him after all the stuff he’s been through, it’s time for full disclosure. If it’s more important to protect his buddy from the embarrassment (no crime is likely) then he deserves to get drilled.Not sure that he needs to publicly name his friend who did it, but I'd imagine he will need to name names to NFL security / police when asked.
That's a value decision but not one that should impact his employment if he can be honest in disclosing necessary details to the NFL/police.Yes. Yes he does. If he expects the public to have ANY confidence in him after all the stuff he’s been through, it’s time for full disclosure. If it’s more important to protect his buddy from the embarrassment (no crime is likely) then he deserves to get drilled.
Whoever did it in his group needs to own up. It’s the right thing to do.
Exactly. He needs to name every single person in the car. And if he recalls, he needs to say who was sitting where and get there versions of the story as well.Yes. Yes he does. If he expects the public to have ANY confidence in him after all the stuff he’s been through, it’s time for full disclosure. If it’s more important to protect his buddy from the embarrassment (no crime is likely) then he deserves to get drilled.
This changes no evidence on his rape case by the way.I appreciate his greatness on the field but thats beginning to be it. He won a national title
Here but I still remember like it was yesterday listening to the radio in the early fall of 2013 and hearing ‘Jameis Winston has been accused of sexual assault’ and the avalanche that followed til the day he left and here we sit over 4 years later and more smoke. I don’t wanna believe there was anything to any of this but I’m also not naive.
Legally he may not have to but he does this at his own risk. Publicly he’s done if he can’t say who did it.That's a value decision but not one that should impact his employment if he can be honest in disclosing necessary details to the NFL/police.
Can society skewer him, yes. But if it's more important to him to not throw his friend to the wolves (even though the friend might deserve it), then that's a choice Jameis has the right to make and deal w/ the societal fall out.
i thought the story was ONE person was put in the car.Exactly. He needs to name every single person in the car. And if he recalls, he needs to say who was sitting where and get there versions of the story as well.
A key fact that should easily be able to be proven or not is if he was the only passenger in the car or not.
Per Jameis' statement it sounds like he is disputing that.Legally he may not have to but he does this at his own risk. Publicly he’s done if he can’t say who did it.
She WILL be believed. The only issue is who did it. If he won’t say who it was, he will eat this. And he should.
i thought the story was ONE person was put in the car.
I agree, he'll suffer publicly if he doesn't name names or the person who did it doesn't step up... but that's choice / consequence that is up to him to decide. I won't comment on whether he "should" "eat this", but we are a society of bloodlust, so he will.Legally he may not have to but he does this at his own risk. Publicly he’s done if he can’t say who did it.
She WILL be believed. The only issue is who did it. If he won’t say who it was, he will eat this. And he should.
i thought the story was ONE person was put in the car.