Was the Vinci police chief at the party? The guy with the Sam Jackson in Unbreakable Afro? Wasn't that who Notebook saw when she quickly left that one room?
I think this season is getting a bad rap. I really like it. Season 1 wasn't exactly non stop action people just loved it bc McConaghey.
2 reasons.....DaddarioNot even close as to why people loved last season.
I think this season is getting a bad rap. I really like it. Season 1 wasn't exactly non stop action people just loved it bc McConaghey.
I think that's a safe assumption, I also think he's the crow mask killer who offed Casper and shot Valcoro with the rubber bullets. He was first on scene after he was shot, he was also all up in Valcoro's apartment without a key.
The birdman is a red herring and not the true killer. I think birdman (or birdman/birdwoman) is looking to expose the Da Vinci corruption going all the way back to the riots and the killing of the two orphans parents, who I would suspect are the "birdmen." Why else would they not just kill Ray when going after the hard drive? Just because the birdman dumped Caspere's body, doesn't mean it was the killer.
Now have we been introduce to the orphans? Probably, they certainly look like Chessani's children, but they certainly do not seem intelligent enough to pull off such a task. Which brings us back to our flawed 'detectives', who can't seem to get out of their own way and screw up just about everything imaginable. This season's "true detective" is going to be the birdman, whoever that ends up being.
Now have we been introduce to the orphans? Probably, they certainly look like Chessani's children, but they certainly do not seem intelligent enough to pull off such a task
Yup, sure was! I missed it first time through.
https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueDetect..._list_of_all_important_people_we_saw_at_that/
I think the writer is really trying to show that he deserves the credit from season 1 and is failing.
The birdman is a red herring and not the true killer. I think birdman (or birdman/birdwoman) is looking to expose the Da Vinci corruption going all the way back to the riots and the killing of the two orphans parents, who I would suspect are the "birdmen." Why else would they not just kill Ray when going after the hard drive? Just because the birdman dumped Caspere's body, doesn't mean it was the killer.
Now have we been introduce to the orphans? Probably, they certainly look like Chessani's children, but they certainly do not seem intelligent enough to pull off such a task. Which brings us back to our flawed 'detectives', who can't seem to get out of their own way and screw up just about everything imaginable. This season's "true detective" is going to be the birdman, whoever that ends up being.
I've been thinking about this show a bit. I was slow to take in this season, probably influenced by all the negative advance press. And the first one or two were awful slow and fairly boring/dense. But finally one weekend I binged on 3-4 in a row, and I really came around to it.
I think the biggest issue is that a lot of critics went overboard overrating the first season, and then felt kind of foolish as it played out. There was a lot of backtracking at the end of season 1, but I think there was also a whole lot of inclination to bury this one because of that, to get their licks in now, and prove that they aren't suckers. I think the critical response has been more negative than the show deserves, at least in comparison to season one.
People are acting as if Season 1 was an A+, and this is an F. I think it's a lot closer to Season 1 being a B+ and this being a B- or C+. It's a lot closer than it's being made out to be, for me.
The huge difference is the leads. McC and Harrelson masked a LOT of the ridiculous by owning the screen the way they did. It's hard to think of an example of leads elevating the material more than that. That's not a bad thing, but it was almost certainly not duplicable.
The thing is, once you get past the performances...last season was bat---crazy. Next level bonkers. With a too much info, confusing plot lines, things that went nowhere, and somehow a lot of boring stuff too. But the leads, and the whole Yellow King red herring, distracted.
These four leads are not bad at all...but they just don't have the gravitas last years' leads do. And that's ok. I'm actually digging them more and more as the show goes on, because these characters and the performances are as totally wacked out as the story. This isn't "serious drama". This is nuthouse stuff...Chinatown type stuff, and these performances fit right in. I'm enjoying Vince Vaughn more and more every week.
I don't think it's a great show, but I think it's a good and enjoyable show, and should be more or less allowed to just be what it is, instead of trying to live up to being prestige drama.
To be fair...the creator brings a lot of that on himself, with his arrogance and his clear aspirations toward prestige drama. I don't think he has a great handle on his own work.
Meanwhile I would give last season an A+.
Yet after the first 3 episodes, you were trashing it.
I have watched the first two episodes of season 1 on three different occasions and I am actually five minutes away from the end of episode 3 of season 1 and think that this series sucks, but because of all the good reviews here, I am going to give episode 4 a shot in a few minutes and then decide if I will continue or not.
Had a friend say it reminded him of a sad Pink Panther caper song. The music was very noir-esque, what made it odd was the juxtaposition in comparison to the rest of the music in the show.
The scene really reminded me of Eyes Wide Shut.
The orgy scene was a let down b/c I read where they hired a bunch of pornstars and we got some half assed orgy scenes.
I have watched the first two episodes of season 1 on three different occasions and I am actually five minutes away from the end of episode 3 of season 1 and think that this series sucks, but because of all the good reviews here, I am going to give episode 4 a shot in a few minutes and then decide if I will continue or not.
Can someone explain the gemstones and the two random children?
OK, I struggled through the end of season one and I liked season 2 a lot better than season one. I thought the entire season 1 was slow, except for the last episode and a half.
OK, I struggled through the end of season one and I liked season 2 a lot better than season one. I thought the entire season 1 was slow, except for the last episode and a half.
OK, I struggled through the end of season one and I liked season 2 a lot better than season one. I thought the entire season 1 was slow, except for the last episode and a half.
Plenty of intelligent thought and I tried watching from the beginning a couple of times, I just thought that it was slow, especially where there was just 8 episodes. I thought that the acting was great, especially MM. I think, overall, the cast/acting in 2 is better. I know that I am in the extreme minority when 8 say that I think that 2 was better.
I found this solid theory on Reddit regarding the Russian Osip and our dead man Stan:
Let’s talk about the obvious – the Russians. They showed up when Caspere died and are seen with all of the major players, yet they almost seem to be overlooked as the primary suspects behind everything. Could they be behind it all? Here’s a theory that tries to put it all together.
Osip has Caspere killed just before arriving in the US. The Russians ransack Caspere’s house and take Frank’s money. This undercuts the deal Frank made with Caspere. We even see Osip mockingly tell Frank in episode one that he can’t wait to meet Caspere – it seems clear he knows Caspere is dead. With Frank’s money gone his entire empire, including his ability to hold the casino for long, is in trouble. And we know ‘a foreign buyer’ has expressed interest in it – the Russians. Frank scraps to get his clubs back and manages to stay afloat.
Tascha was working for the Russians. She was one of those “elite untouchable European chicks” and for Caspere she was different – as Paul learns from the male prostitute in Frank’s club. Tascha was having sex with Caspere; I assume this is the gonorrhea connection. The Russians used her to get close to Caspere, who often didn’t approach women, and gain information. She was also able to get Caspere to the house in Hollywood where the Russians wanted him to be killed. They drive Caspere’s body up the coast, and Tascha is no longer needed and is taken up to the cabin where she is killed. The cabin hadn’t been used in some time, but the birds flying above the cabin suggest her death in the shack was fairly recent. They didn’t kill her at the Hollywood house because her death might in some way be a link back to the Russians. The Russians wanted Caspere killed at the Hollywood house because they knew about the blackmail movies and Catalyst’s involvement from Tascha. They didn’t take the HD at the Hollywood house initially because they needed someone else to find it first and report that it exists and is now missing. Doing that would put Catalyst on their heels while not initially exposing the Russian’s position. It just turns out Ray is the one that find the HD. Again they need him alive so riot shells are used only after he sees the HD. The Russians will/are using the HD as leverage against Catalyst or the other prominent people who might be on the video. Perhaps Catalyst made the same deal to the Russians as they did to Frank, and offered to gift some land in exchange for the missing HD which they think is just simply missing.
Blake and/or Stan made a deal with the Russians, perhaps to gain a piece of Frank’s empire once he is gone, perhaps the casino. Stan either found out about Blake, or in some other way became a risk and was killed. His eyes are burned out just like Caspere because it’s the same killer both times – the Russians. This helps explain why Blake is seen with the Chessani son, Pitlor and Osip later on.
The Vinci PD and the diamonds are the red herring. The Vinci PD were also buying in on the land deal with Caspere and paid him with the blue diamonds. Caspere came up with the cash to cover their part by overcharging Frank by a few million. The pictures that surfaced of the diamonds are evidence of them being transferred to Caspere, which is how he came to possess them. When Vinci PD finds out Caspere is dead they start searching for their diamonds. This explains why Burris shows up in Hollywood so quickly, he’s there to look for the missing diamonds. It also explains why they put Dixon, and only Dixon, on the case with Ray in the beginning. They wanted to ensure that if he finds the diamonds they find their way back to Vinci PD. In fact, they do find the diamonds and Dixon ensures they find their way back to Vinci PD. With their diamonds safely back in their hands, they frame the Mexicans and get the case shut and the spotlight taken off of Vinci.
The investigation is reopened. From there, Ani, Frank and Paul find a way to infiltrate one of the sex parties where we learn about the deal between the Russians and Catalyst, this time for $12 million. The Russians who previously had cold feet about getting into a smaller deal with Frank, are now suddenly ready to drop significantly more money directly with Catalyst. So their position is clearly strengthened at this point.
I know this doesn’t explain everything, but it’s the most sense I can make out of what’s happened so far. What do you think?
I missed it too. I did catch the AG that was supposedly investigating the Vinci guys, so the fact that they were all there together just drives home the point that the whole Vinci investigation was just a shakedown.
There are big holes in this theory.
- So the Russians waited to kill Tashca for 2 months? Remember, when we resume after the shoot-out, 2 months have passed and the investigation into Caspere's death is closed. Those birds are not going to be circling months or even weeks after the body has been removed. Whoever was killed there was killed recently. Also, everyone on the case has aleady pinned Capere's murder on the Mexicans, so there has been no heat on that trail since the shootout.
- The head of Catalyst is still on the trail for the tape lost at the S&M house. That's why he's put Frank on it and offered him (false promise?) to get back in on the deal.
- Shortly after this, the head of Catalyst is seen at the party with Pitlor, Osip, Toni, Captain of Vinci PD, and Blake. It would seem all sides are cozy, not at odds with each other. Does not seem likely the Russians are blackmailing Catalyst, but it does seem obvious that they are in on the deal behind Frank's back and directly with Catalyst. This was brought up earlier in the season. They may have found out the land should have only been for $10 million, not $12 million like Caspere had angled to Frank.
- Because of #2, that does not explain why the Russians would want Ray to find the HD just before he's shot. Ray never gives the HD much additional thought. It becomes Frank that starts hunting the HD only because Catalyst asks him for it. Ray finding it had nothing to do with that, Catalyst already knew it existed. There was no need for Ray to find it to progress the story.
Just some quick thoughts. The Russians are clearly in play, no one is overlooking them. It's also clear from the last episode that Chessani, Vinci PD, Pitlor, Blake, Osip, and Catalyst are all in cahaoots.
@Nole Lou I'll have to double check, but I'm pretty sure the Lincoln was parked facing the opposite direction as Ray's car as he pulls up. Going to check it out now.I don't pay that close of attention to all the twists and turns, but is it possible Ray's shooter tailed him to the house, and didn't know the location, and just discovered the house (and the hard drive) at that moment? Or do we know the shooter was waiting for him?