Something tells me her days of deciding what to wear each day are pretty much over.
Orange is the new blue.Something tells me her days of deciding what to wear each day are pretty much over.
There is a great special if you haven't seen it, disappeared season 4. I saw it years ago and again recentlyYou would never in a million years think this is how the soap opera played out. Denise was a southern belle-- she would occasionally show up at Food Lion to see Mike-- she was real pretty back then too. Now I watch her being taken out in handcuffs and I can't believe. Where is Dateline NBC or ABC's 20/20?
There is a great special if you haven't seen it, disappeared season 4. I saw it years ago and again recently
Something tells me her days of deciding what to wear each day are pretty much over.
Interesting that FSU cops were transporting her. I realize she was on FSU property at the time of the arrest, but I just found that a little different than what I would have expected.
I'm sure that's all negotiated in advance. FSU cops probably looking for some "good" PR.
Mugshot
Mugshot
She looks like a hardened and mean woman. The eyes are not friendly or forgiving. Jackson County Sheriff's Detective Derrick Wester described her as "the coldest woman I have ever been around." This picture supports that quote. They will need to soften her up dramatically before she confronts her 12 jurors. I think she is guilty as hell based on her body language after the arrest. Someone should have coached her on that too.
Derrick Wester is a good guy—- he was one of the first to help Ms. Williams (Mikes mom). I can only imagine his opinion of Denise and Brian...
Not yet. His attorney is quoted in an article saying he doesn't expect him to be charged and would testify with immunity.So did the guy Brian get charged with anything here?
Not yet. His attorney is quoted in an article saying he doesn't expect him to be charged and would testify with immunity.
You can tell from Jensen's comments that his client got immunity to roll over on the ex-wife. This was all a pre-packaged deal. Winchester got 20 years for the kidnapping (with much of that "really" applying to the murder), and now the ex-wife will likely get life in prison for her involvement in the murder. Follow the timeline....everything fell into place after Winchester was sentenced. From his standpoint, he'll end up doing 12-14 years, and he avoided the risk of the death penalty or life in prison.
.
Made national now:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/3eefc7dd-4231-3421-aa53-e95c86bfe20f/ss_florida-widow-arrested-in.html
The link is on yahoo but is from Fox News....
The first comment on the article made me laugh....
in reference to the mug shot: "But she looks so very friendly..."
I'm sure after his conviction he went to police and said I will tell you what happened and we can nail Denise, but you have to grant me immunity.Not yet. His attorney is quoted in an article saying he doesn't expect him to be charged and would testify with immunity.
Agreed. I just haven't seen anything official. It does appear that way.You can tell from Jensen's comments that his client got immunity to roll over on the ex-wife. This was all a pre-packaged deal. Winchester got 20 years for the kidnapping (with much of that "really" applying to the murder), and now the ex-wife will likely get life in prison for her involvement in the murder. Follow the timeline....everything fell into place after Winchester was sentenced. From his standpoint, he'll end up doing 12-14 years, and he avoided the risk of the death penalty or life in prison.
The ex-wife's trial should be an entertaining circus. She will claim it was all Winchester's idea, and that she had all kinds of mental problems, blah-blah-blah.
I guess we will see how much "good stuff" Winchester really had on her.
This "may" be a difficult day for her?
It doesn't matter that it was "18 years later". Guilty is guilty and this is a murder case. How long ago this was is irrelevant as far as proving the case.I fully believe she was a part of the murder but will the testimony of a guy locked up really be enough to convict her 18 years later?
She says she didn't know anything, he came along after the fact as a shoulder to cry on. Down the road she got suspicious and started asking questions about his involvement, it led to the divorce and further down the road he was upset that she was still digging for answers and kidnapped her.
He said she said with the only recent fact that he was the kidnapper and she was the victim.
I fully believe she was a part of the murder but will the testimony of a guy locked up really be enough to convict her 18 years later?
She says she didn't know anything, he came along after the fact as a shoulder to cry on. Down the road she got suspicious and started asking questions about his involvement, it led to the divorce and further down the road he was upset that she was still digging for answers and kidnapped her.
He said she said with the only recent fact that he was the kidnapper and she was the victim.
Yep, you are correct (IMO). She will play the harmless woman card, it was all the evil man's fault, but it's obvious they were having an affair and wanted Mike out of the way. They plotted it out and decided to get rich in the process. They wouldn't have arrested her had he not been the evidence they needed. Sucks he doesn't get life, but without his testimony she would be free. Deal with the devil.
How bold to have him set Mike up with a big insurance policy before they killed him. Then they get married. That one was hard to figure out!
It doesn't matter that it was "18 years later". Guilty is guilty and this is a murder case. How long ago this was is irrelevant as far as proving the case.
She had motive, she pushed for him to be declared dead so she could collect on the insurance money, she cut the grandmother off when the grandmother wouldn't stop pushing for them to investigate it as foul play. There is motive, circumstantial evidence, and the guy who led them to the body (you have to assume) is going to likely testify against her.
I think they have enough to convict her. They took this long after finding his body so you would think they built a strong case that they were confident they could convict on.
It wouldn't surprise me if Brian didn't tell the 100% truthful story to help out friends and family who law enforcement have long-suspected were involved after the fact. Jack Campbell continues to mislead the public on this like he did in December when he pretended they hadn't had Mike's body for three months before revealing it. And the comment that they believe it happened in Jackson County is a 180 degree turn from what they had always said. I've long believed there are people involved who "they" simply do not want to charge as accessories. Mrs. Williams knows who these people are and I wonder what all her and his brother are thinking with just this one arrest and new claim about Jackson County. Campbell says something like "if evidence leads to others involved, we will go there", but Winchester either told them others helped, or he didn't. I don't know if/why Denise would roll over on others who were also AATF, but it will be interesting.
The only problem I have after reading the above theries is how the heck does someone get 20 years for pulling the trigger.
So he pleas a deal saying I can tell you where the body is and who was the mastermind behind the plan if I get a lesser sentence? Sheesh. Both of them should rot in prison for the rest of their lives.
USA Today has a news story on this as well...
I'm not saying the 18 years makes it less guilt. I'm just saying at this point the evidence gathering is a lot different than if someone pointed the finger at someone else for a crime that occurred 6 months ago.
None of that motive and cirumstantial evidence are new. The only thing new is that they found a skeleton and someone willing to testify that they committed the murder and their ex wife who they kidnapped helped....
When I spoke to Mrs Williams in December she rattled off a bunch of other names that could be involved.... including a drug cartel?
Buddy Green- my sister mentioned to me that the murder was in Jackson county and I was like huh? (she read the findings from the jury)... I thought it occurred in Tallahassee—maybe at their house (as we discussed in this thread). Why the heck would they kill someone in Jackson Co and then drive the body back to a few miles from their home to bury it...happy to see you back (at Warchant) by the way!