#KeepingItGoing
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that is what these young whippersnapper‘s refer to when guy dribbles behind the back to make a move.Chicken wrap?
Reminder for @DFSNOLE @NoleLizards @SeaPA @Bill From Tampa @Bobcat07 @fsu67810 @seminoleed @ktnole @fsUTampa @cmanole @JohnnieHolmesNole @Tom81 @Bml07
We are less than a week from first tee time of The Sentry Tournament of Champions and the start of Season 11 on the PGSF FedEx Cup Challenge
Anyone else interested in joining please look for sign up thread that will be posted Sunday
I’m only coming if I can bring my service dog.
The old fat guy and the man who had a stroke. Don't think your investigation is going to find PEDS.You are welcome to bring the service dog, @NoleLizards and @DFSNOLE have been under investigation for at least 2 years based on performance
Not unless beer, wings, & pizza are considered PEDs....The old fat guy and the man who had a stroke. Don't think your investigation is going to find PEDS.
The old fat guy and the man who had a stroke. Don't think your investigation is going to find PEDS.
For purely medicinal purposes. That includes the pizza, wings and beer.Interesting, Liz has admitted to using a NASA level randomizer in this very thread. Your tactics to throw off this investigation will not work sir.
Are Ouija boards banned?Interesting, Liz has admitted to using a NASA level randomizer in this very thread. Your tactics to throw off this investigation will not work sir.
Are Ouija boards banned?
Cigars and whiskey. Of course. Thanks, Mr. Overton. You have helped us go forward and we all appreciate your leadership.... Much love and mucho thanks to you.
That’s just the beginning of a big ole locker room crew. We all have issues. Lord knows we need some tissues...The old fat guy and the man who had a stroke. Don't think your investigation is going to find PEDS.
I’m certainly hoping for the worst...Get ready for a bunch of calls from the ACC refs about Oklahoma giving Alabama the business.
UGA clearly better than ND imo. The committee has to go...
If ND was #3 then yeah. When have the polls ever been much more than a popularity contest anyway?So...The #3 team (that was an undefeated P5 school) doesn't get into the playoff?
This is a better argument for going back to the BCS than it is for expanding the playoff (or changing the teams).
UGA's best argument for getting in was one half in a game they lost. No thank you.UGA clearly better than ND imo. The committee has to go...
They took the best team down to the wire. You could make a case right now that they are better than ND, Ok and soon to probably be Clemson. And since the committee wants the four best, UGA belongs...UGA's best argument for getting in was one half in a game they lost. No thank you.
So, based on Oklahoma's second half in a loss, they clearly belonged too, right?They took the best team down to the wire. You could make a case right now that they are better than ND, Ok and soon to probably be Clemson. And since the committee wants the four best, UGA belongs...
I believe they are better than ND, so yeah...So, based on Oklahoma's second half in a loss, they clearly belonged too, right?
They had no problem telling all of us about Dexter Lawrence of Clemson. They reported very little about the suspensions on their sacred cow.Need to go to eight teams. That and media needs to do a better job pointing out the two best teams, by far this season, had six players suspended for PED
It doesn’t matter according to the committee LAST YEAR. Last year they wanted the four best teams so they gave Alabama, who didn’t even play in their conference championship, a pass. This year by all accounts Alabama was the best team and UGA took them down to the wire - which means they are almost as good and certainly as good or better than the next three teams. UGA got hosed...I had to stop looking at Facebook last night because all my uga friends wouldn't stop posting about how they belonged in the playoff. I do like how they conveniently forget about their terrible game against LSU, as if it doesn't matter.
I seem to recall a few years ago the 4-team playoff being justified by a comment that arguments over 4 vs 5 wouldn't be nearly as bad as arguments over 2 vs 3.